Cited by 6Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Adult Neurogenesis in Mammals and Nonmammals

Powers, Alice Schade·2013·Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Abstract

processes as dentate gyrus neurogenesis is in mammals, i.e. by learning and cognitive stimulation. Thus, his paper does not acknowledge the existence of evidence that neurogenesis in widespread areas of the nonmammalian brain is subject to the same processes as neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of mammals. For example, enriched environments enhance adult neurogenesis in nonmammals, just as Kempermann and others have shown in extensive studies of mammals [e.g., Kempermann et al., 1997; Nilsson et al., 1999; van Praag et al., 1999]. Mountain chickadees that live in the wild, where the environment is presumably richer, show more neurogenesis in the hippocampus than those that live in a laboratory setting [LaDage et al., 2010], and mountain chickadees that live in the laboratory and are allowed to cache seeds show more adult neurogenesis than those prevented from caching seeds [LaDage et al., 2010]. Painted turtles exposed to an enriched environment show more adult neurogenesis in the telencephalon, including the homologue of the hippocampus, the medial cortex, compared to those housed individually in tanks with little opportunity for stimulation [Powers and Hanusch, 2012]. After exposure to an enriched environment, there was an increase in the numIn a recent article in Nature Reviews Neuroscience , Kempermann [2012] proposed that adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of mammals may function differently from the adult neurogenesis seen in the brains of nonmammals and, rather th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000350932

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo detectability of neurogenesis in humans has been difficult, and due to impaired comparability between species, opinions on its functional relevance in humans diverge.

    “In vivo detectability of neurogenesis in humans has been difficult and due to impaired comparability between species, opinions on the functional relevance in humans diverge (Aimone et al., 2010;Powers, 2013).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 6

Authors
Powers, A. S.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Powers, Alice Schade
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
206-208
ISSN
  • 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9743
OpenAlex
W2243292461
Cited by
6
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
adult neurogenesis, dentate gyrus, environmental enrichment, hippocampus, telencephalon, mountain chickadee, painted turtle, cognitive stimulation, learning and memory, behavioral flexibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neurons, Dentate Gyrus, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review