Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Short- and Long-Term Treatment of Mouse Cortical Primary Astrocytes with β-Amyloid Differentially Regulates the mRNA Expression of L-Type Calcium Channels

Daschil, Nina, Geisler, Stefanie, Obermair, Gerald J., Humpel, Christian·2014·Pharmacology

Abstract

Background: It is well established that reactive astrocytes express L-type calcium channels (LTCC), but their functional role is completely unknown. We have recently shown that reactive astrocytes highly express the Ca V 1.2 α 1-subunit around β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques in an Alzheimer mouse model. The aim of the present study was to explore whether Aβ peptides may regulate the mRNA expression of all LTCC subunits in primary mouse astrocytes in culture. Methods: Confluent primary astrocytes were incubated with 10 µg/ml of human or murine Aβ or the toxic fragment Aβ 25-35 for 3 days or for 3 weeks. The LTCC subunits were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Results: Our data show that murine Aβ 42 slightly but significantly increased Ca V 1.2 and Ca V 1.3 expression when incubated for 3 days. This acute treatment with murine Aβ enhanced β 2 and β 3 mRNA levels but decreased α 2 δ-2 mRNA expression. When astrocytes were incubated for 3 weeks, the levels of Ca V 1.2 α 1 were significantly decreased by the murine Aβ and the toxic fragment. As a control, the protein kinase C-ε activator DCP-LA displayed a decrease in Ca V 2.1 expression. Conclusion: In conclusion, our data show that Aβ can differentially regulate LTCC expression in primary mouse astrocytes depending on incubation time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000357383

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 channels play a role in astrocytic calcium signaling, have been linked to reactive astrocyte states, and show decreased expression upon prolonged Aß treatment.

    “Of note the Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 channels are known to play a role in astrocytic calcium signaling, have been linked to reactive astrocyte states [40] and show decreased expression upon prolonged Aß treatment [41].”

    From A role for astrocytic miR-129-5p in frontotemporal dementia (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/0197-4580(87)90074-1 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0197-4580(87)90073-X · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00295.x · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.521 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/978-94-007-6334-0_2 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.6095454 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/glia.10162 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/glia.10336 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00489.x · DOI
  11. 10.3233/JAD-2010-091117 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/glia.20555 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ceca.2013.08.002 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/glia.440040504 · DOI
  15. 10.3233/JAD-130560 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11060-004-1364-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.037 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M109.016683 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.12.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/bi062217x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02922-X · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0006-291X(87)90419-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19970115)47:2<216::AID-JNR10>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.2218531 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/15401420490426990 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1096/fj.04-2659fje · DOI
  29. 10.1006/nbdi.2000.0313 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Daschil, N., Geisler, S., Obermair, G. J., & Humpel, C.
Venue
Pharmacology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014
Volume
93
Issue
1-2
Pages
24-31
ISSN
  • 0031-7012
  • 1423-0313
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review