The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Achieving Diagnostic Certainty in Resource-Limited Settings
Abstract
Disorders of sex development are complex disorders with atypical chromosomal, gonadal or anatomical sex. Decision making in relation to sex assignment has been perceived as extremely disturbing and difficult for families and healthcare professionals. This is mainly due to a general paucity of information about the condition, lack of advanced diagnostic settings, and an exaggerated feeling of stigma and shame associated with genital abnormalities. Lack of accurate healthcare information and reporting results in poor knowledge about the exact incidence and impact of these disorders in resource-poor countries. Lack of neonatal screening facilities for congenital adrenal hyperplasia often results in delayed diagnosis of these disorders and perhaps a higher number of deaths, especially in male children who lack ambiguity of genitalia. Technically more sophisticated investigations are often not available or affordable, posing further difficulties in establishing a diagnosis. Limited resources also include the lack of availability of adequately trained personal. Thus, the establishment of the recommended and necessary multidisciplinary team is often hard to accomplish in these countries. This seriously compromises the ability to manage these children properly. Finally, countries in places like Southeast and Far East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are often accompanied with their unique cultural and social issues, filled with myths and misconceptions, which worsens the already complex situation. Thus, a huge limitation exists in dealing with these children with disorders that are complex to diagnose and manage, even in countries with advanced and well-equipped medical facilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Almost a quarter of these are benign adrenal myelolipomas, which generally occur in patients with a history of poor hormonal control, suggesting that persistent ACTH stimulation may play a role in pathogenesis (628,726,727).”
From Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia—Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management (2022) · cites this paper as [727]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia—Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management
Claahsen - van der Grinten, H. L., Speiser, P. W., Ahmed, S. F., Arlt, W., Auchus, R. J., Falhammar, H., Flück, C. E., Guasti, L., Huebner, A., Kortmann, B. B. M., et al. (2022) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnab016 · Cited by 556
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazen, I., & Raza, J.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Child Health (PK)
- Venue
- Endocrine Development
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 257-267
- ISSN
- 1421-7082 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-2979
- OpenAlex
- W1530582401
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrine development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- disorders of sex development, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, gender assignment, resource-limited settings, delayed diagnosis, multidisciplinary care, newborn screening, stigma, health workforce shortage, incidence and mortality
- MeSH terms
- Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Disorders of Sex Development, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review