Analysis of correlations between patient-oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD) and other assessment scores of atopic dermatitis severity and quality of life
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Self-assessment scores such as the Patient-Oriented Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD) index being recommended by public health authorities for chronic disease management, we aimed at analysing correlations between PO-SCORAD and physician and patient assessment scores of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and quality of life. METHODS: We perfomed an observational study conducted in 12 European countries in 4,222 atopic patients aged ≥1 month and prescribed Exomega® emollient cream. AD severity was measured by the SCORAD index, PO-SCORAD, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index (SA-EASI) scales, and patient and family quality of life by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Dermatitis Family Questionnaire Impact (DFQI) scales, respectively. Their correlations were analysed. RESULTS: PO-SCORAD was the only self-assessment score to be highly correlated with the SCORAD index and POEM (r ≥ 0.70). It was also the best correlated with the DLQI (r = 0.67) and DFQI (r = 0.56). After a 5-week treatment, SCORAD index and PO-SCORAD severity scores had decreased significantly by 60 and 56% (p < 0.0001), and quality of life had improved. CONCLUSION: PO-SCORAD is better correlated with quality of life scales than other self-assessment scores.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In former studies, SCORAD scores rated by clinicians and PO-SCORAD scores rated by patients highly correlate.
“In former studies, it was shown that SCORAD scores rated by clinicians and PO-SCORAD scores rated by patients highly correlate (24, 26).”
From Mindfulness as Predictor of Itch Catastrophizing in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: Results of a Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Coutanceau, C., & Stalder, J.-F.
- Affiliations
- Pierre Fabre (France) (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
- Venue
- Dermatology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 229
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 248-255
- ISSN
- 1018-8665 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9832
- OpenAlex
- W1982061770
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- atopic dermatitis, patient-reported outcome measures, disease severity assessment, quality of life, SCORAD, poetry, Dermatology Life Quality Index, treatment response
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatologic Agents, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Confidence Intervals, Risk Assessment, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review