Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Prevalence and Severity of White Matter Lesions, Their Relationship with Age, Ethnicity, Gender, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: The ARIC Study

Liao, Duanping, Cooper, Lawton, Cai, Jianwen, Toole, James, Bryan, Nick, Burke, Gregory, Shahar, Eyal, Nieto, Javier, Mosley, Thomas, Heiss, Gerardo·2014·Neuroepidemiology

Abstract

White matter lesions (WMLs) detected by cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are putatively a consequence of cerebral hypoperfusion or ischemia. We investigated the prevalence, severity and correlates of WMLs in a population-based sample of 1,920 African-American and European-American men and women aged 55-72 years, during the second follow-up examination of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. The spin density images from 1.5-tesla MRI scans were used to define WMLs using a 0-9 scale with 0 for normal and 9 for most severe WMLs. Age was positively associated with the prevalence (percent) and severity of WMLs. African-Americans had lower overall prevalence of WMLs, but a higher prevalence of relatively more severe WMLs, than European-Americans. After adjusting for age, sex, and ethnicity, WMLs were significantly associated with smoking, lower education, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure, and weakly associated with diastolic blood pressure. The associations of smoking, alcohol intake, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, pressure, and hypertension were stronger in African-Americans than in European-Americans (p < 0.15 for interactions by ethnicity). This population-based MRI study documents significant relationships between several cardiovascular disease risk factors and WMLs. The findings suggest that such factors play a role in the pathogenesis of WMLs, an elements linked to hypoperfusion and/or fluid accumulation, which presumably lead to WMLs. African-Americans exhibited both a higher proportion of normal white matter and a higher proportion of relatively more severe WMLs than European-Americans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000368814

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Liao, D., Cooper, L., Cai, J., Toole, J., Bryan, N., Burke, G., Shahar, E., Nieto, J., Mosley, T., & Heiss, G.
Venue
Neuroepidemiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014-10-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
149-162
ISSN
  • 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0208
OpenAlex
W2048507870
Cited by
429
References
0
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence and Severity of White Matter Lesions, Their Relationship with Age, Ethnicity, Gender, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: The ARIC Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000368814
The paper
Liao, D., Cooper, L., Cai, J., Toole, J., Bryan, N., Burke, G., Shahar, E., Nieto, J., Mosley, T., & Heiss, G. (2014). The Prevalence and Severity of White Matter Lesions, Their Relationship with Age, Ethnicity, Gender, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: The ARIC Study. Neuroepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368814

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.