The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oral Fluoride Levels 1 h after Use of a Sodium Fluoride Rinse: Effect of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
Abstract
Increasing the concentration of free fluoride in oral fluids is an important goal in the use of topical fluoride agents. Although sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is a common dentifrice ingredient, the influence of this ion on plaque fluid and salivary fluid fluoride has not been examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of SLS on these parameters and to examine the effect of this ion on total (or whole) plaque fluoride, an important source of plaque fluid fluoride after a sufficient interval following fluoride administration, and on total salivary fluoride, a parameter often used as a surrogate measure of salivary fluid fluoride. Ten subjects accumulated plaque for 48 h before rinsing with a 12 mmol/l NaF (228 µg/g F) rinse containing or not containing 0.5% (w/w) SLS. SLS had no statistically significant effect on total plaque and total saliva fluoride but significantly increased salivary fluid and plaque fluid fluoride (by 147 and 205%, respectively). These results suggest that the nonfluoride components of topical agents can be manipulated to improve the fluoride release characteristics from oral fluoride reservoirs and that statistically significant change may be observed in plaque fluid and salivary fluid fluoride concentrations that may not be observed in total plaque and total saliva fluoride concentrations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During the first hour after using over-the-counter fluoride treatments, fluoride concentrations in oral fluids drop to <1 mM.
“However, during the first hour after using these treatments, fluoride concentrations in the oral fluids drop to <1 mM (12–15).”
From Fluoride export is required for the competitive fitness of pathogenic microorganisms in dental biofilm models (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1159/000261094 · DOI
- 10.1159/000261048 · DOI
- 10.1021/je950234b · DOI
- 10.1159/000261354 · DOI
- 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0307 · DOI
- 10.1021/j100840a034 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034510375827 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00409.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.04.010 · DOI
- 10.1159/000262360 · DOI
- 10.1177/154405910508401202 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00231.x · DOI
- 10.1177/154405910608500911 · DOI
- 10.1159/000325166 · DOI
- 10.1159/000154786 · DOI
- 10.1159/000091121 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345970760030801 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345920710030501 · DOI
- 10.1159/000016615 · DOI
- 10.1159/000094293 · DOI
- 10.1177/154405910808700513 · DOI
- 10.1159/000287239 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000354047 · DOI
- 10.1159/000047442 · DOI
- 10.1159/000063931 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345920710110201 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345920710090101 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Banerjee, A., Kang, C.-Y., An, M., Koff, B. B., Sunder, S., Kumar, A., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Stockbridge, R. B. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00184-24 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogel, G. L., Schumacher, G. E., Chow, L. C., & Tenuta, L. M. A.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-296
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review