Comparative Anatomy and Function of Skin as Related to Experimental Chemical Carcinogenesis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carcinogenic sensitivity and skin irritation reactivity differ depending on the hair cycle.
“Carcinogenic sensitivity and skin irritation reactivity differ depending on the hair cycle35.”
From Morphological characteristics and notes of the skin in preclinical toxicity assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morphological characteristics and notes of the skin in preclinical toxicity assessment
Moroki, T. (2023) · Journal of Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1293/tox.2022-0103 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bock, F. G.
- Corresponding author
- Bock, Fred G.
- Venue
- Progress in Tumor Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2015-04-16
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 5-17
- ISSN
- 2296-1887 (ISSN-L)
- 2296-1895
- OpenAlex
- W2278478379
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in tumor research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
- Keywords
- skin, comparative anatomy, skin function, chemical carcinogenesis, experimental carcinogenesis, skin carcinogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Hair, Neoplasms, Experimental, Pigmentation, Sebaceous Glands, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Skin Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
