Cited by 48Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Population-Based Evidence that Survival in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Is Related to Weight Loss at Diagnosis

Marin, Benoît, Arcuti, Simona, Jesus, Pierre, Logroscino, Giancarlo, Copetti, Massimiliano, Fontana, Andrea, Nicol, Marie, Raymondeau, Marie +4 more·2016·Neurodegenerative Diseases

Abstract

Background/Aims: In a population-based setting, we aimed to (i) describe weight loss (WL) of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients at the time of diagnosis and (ii) evaluate the association between WL and survival. Methods: All patients recruited in the FRALim register (2000-2013) were considered to be included in this study. Time-to-death analyses were performed using a multivariable Cox model. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed. Results: Among 322 patients in the register, 261 (81%) were included. At the time of diagnosis, 50.6% of patients reported a WL of more than 5%: 14.6% with WL between 5 and 10% and 36.0% with a WL of more than 10%. WL was independently associated with survival (p = 0.002). Patients with a WL of 10% or more experienced a 45% increase in the risk of death (95% CI 6-99) with respect to patients with a WL lower than 5% or no WL. The introduction of WL significantly improved the model's discrimination achieving a survival C statistic of 79.5% (95% CI 75.6-83.5, p = 0.006) at 12 months. Conclusion: More than 50% of ALS patients experience a WL of more than 5% at the time of diagnosis. This finding highlights the need for randomized trials to evaluate the effect of nutritional interventions to improve ALS survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000442444

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marin, B., Arcuti, S., Jesus, P., Logroscino, G., Copetti, M., Fontana, A., Nicol, M., Raymondeau, M., Desport, J. C., Preux, P. M., Couratier, P., & (FRALim), O. B. O. T. F. R. O. A. I. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Épidémiologie des maladies chroniques en zone tropicale (FR)
Venue
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2016
Volume
16
Issue
3-4
Pages
225-234
ISSN
  • 1660-2854 (ISSN-L)
  • 1660-2862
OpenAlex
W2268354613
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, weight loss, survival, mortality, nutritional status, dietary intervention, time to death
MeSH terms
Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Prognosis, Registries, Risk, Weight Loss, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review