Epigenetic Interactions and the Brain-Body Communication
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is extensive evidence that positive affects and well-being represent protective factors for health and increase resistance to stressful life situations.
“There is, in fact, extensive evidence that positive affects and well-being represent protective factors for health and increase resistance to stressful life situations 6,32,[36][37][38] .”
From The pursuit of euthymia (2020) · cites this paper as [38]
In “Interventions That Change the Brain and Improve Health” (page unavailable), the paper says coping resources can promote resilience and improved mental health when people face stressful experiences. It does not establish the more specific claim that positive affect and well-being themselves protect health or increase resistance to stress, nor does it characterize the evidence for that claim as extensive. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 39
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Fava GA, Cosci F, Sonino N: Current psy- chosomatic practice. Psychother Psychosom 2017;86:13-30.
- McEwen BS, Stellar E: Stress and the individu- al. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 2093-2101.
- McEwen Psychother Psychosom 2017;86:1-4 DOI: 10.1159/000449150
- Wiley JF, Gruenewald TL, Karlamangla AS, Seeman TE: Modeling multisystem physiolog- ical dysregulation. Psychosom Med 2016; 78: 290-301.
- Waddington CH: The epigenotype. Endeav- our 1942; 1: 18-20.
- Spolidoro M, Baroncelli L, Putignano E, Maya- Vetencourt JF, Viegi A, Maffei L: Food restric- tion enhances visual cortex plasticity in adult- hood. Nat Commun 2011; 2: 320-328.
- Authors
- McEwen, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McEwen, Bruce S.
- ORCID
- McEwen, Bruce S.
- Venue
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2016-11-25
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0348
- OpenAlex
- W2549663075
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- epigenetics, epigenetic interactions, brain-body communication, mind-body problem
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Epigenesis, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
