Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasma Progesterone Levels throughout the Ovarian Cycle of the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)

Harding, R.D., Hulme, R.D., Lunn, S.F., Henderson, Cilla, Aitken, R.J.·1982·Journal of Medical Primatology

Abstract

Radioimmunoassay of progesterone in marmoset plasma has been used to determine ovarian cycle length. Total cycle length was 30.1 +/- 3.8 days (mean +/- SD, n = 30, range 24-41 days, median 29.5 days). The pre-ovulatory (follicular) phase, during which progesterone levels were below 10 ng/ml, lasted for 8.8 +/- 3.7 days (mean +/- SD, n = 30, range 3-20 days, median 8.5 days). The post-ovulatory (luteal) phase, during which progesterone levels were greater than 10 ng/ml, lasted for 21.5 +/- 2.2 days (mean +/- SD, n = 30, range 14-29 days, median 21.5 days). Total cycle length was almost twice that recorded in an earlier study. The reasons for this difference are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000460023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harding, R. D., Hulme, R. D., Lunn, S. F., Henderson, C., & Aitken, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Medical Primatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1982
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
43-51
ISSN
  • 0047-2565
  • 1600-0684
Cited by
49
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review