Cited by 9Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementVascular anomalies and interventions

Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia: Patient Outcomes Using Open Surgical Revascularization

Wagenhäuser, Markus U., Meyer-Janiszewski, Yvonne K., Dueppers, Philip, Spin, Joshua M., Floros, Nikolaos, Schelzig, Hubert, Duran, Mansur·2017·Digestive Surgery

Abstract

Background: Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a rare disease. Open treatment (OT) remains a valuable treatment option. We analyzed patient outcomes after OT and investigated health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Data were analyzed retrospectively. The investigation period was from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2014. We investigated mortality and patency rates using Kaplan-Meier analysis. HRQoL was measured using a 36-item health survey. Various statistical methods were employed. Results: A total of 100 patients (celiac trunk [TC: n = 23], superior mesenteric artery [SMA: n = 26], or both [n = 51]) were included. Median follow-up was 5 ± 35 months. One-year survival rate for TC was 75 ± 11%, for SMA: 79 ± 10%, and for both: 96 ± 3%. TC 5-year survival was 75 ± 11% (SMA: 57 ± 16%: both: 80 ± 8%). Obesity and the length of hospital stay were independently associated with patient survival (p < 0.05). Primary 1-year patency rate was 60 ± 13% for TC (SMA: 86 ± 10%; both: 71 ± 8%) and secondary 1-year patency rate was 84 ± 9% for TC (SMA: 100%; both: 79 ± 7%). HRQoL was inferior compared to the German normative data (p < 0.05). Conclusion: CMI overlaps between gastrointestinal and vascular surgery. OT is safe, and simultaneous revascularization of the TC and the SMA does not affect mortality. Patients would not necessarily benefit from OT in terms of HRQoL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000464413

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagenhäuser, M. U., Meyer-Janiszewski, Y. K., Dueppers, P., Spin, J. M., Floros, N., Schelzig, H., & Duran, M.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Digestive Surgery
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
340-349
ISSN
  • 0253-4886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9883
OpenAlex
W2595131231
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, open surgical revascularization, superior mesenteric artery, celiac artery, health-related quality of life, survival, graft patency, obesity, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Aged, Celiac Artery, Chronic Disease, Endarterectomy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Vascular Patency, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Vascular Grafting, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review