Cited by 216Dental Health and Care UtilizationEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental materials and restorations

Silver Diamine Fluoride Has Efficacy in Controlling Caries Progression in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chibinski, Ana Cláudia, Wambier, Letícia Maíra, Feltrin, Juliana, Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado, Wambier, Denise Stadler, Reis, Alessandra·2017·Caries Research

Abstract

A systematic review was performed to evaluate the efficacy of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in controlling caries progression in children when compared with active treatments or placebos. A search for randomized clinical trials that evaluate the effectiveness of SDF for caries control in children compared to active treatments or placebos with follow-ups longer than 6 months was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, Cochrane Library, and grey literature. The risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Collaboration was used for quality assessment of the studies. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was performed on studies considered at low risk of bias. A total of 5,980 articles were identified. Eleven remained in the qualitative synthesis. Five studies were at “low,” 2 at “unclear,” and 4 studies at “high” risk of bias in the key domains. The studies from which the information could be extracted were included for meta-analysis. The arrestment of caries at 12 months promoted by SDF was 66% higher (95% CI 41-91%; p < 0.00001) than by other active material, but it was 154% higher (95% CI 67-85%; p < 0.00001) than by placebos. Overall, the caries arrestment was 89% higher (95% CI 49-138%; p < 0.00001) than using active materials/placebo. No heterogeneity was detected. The evidence was graded as high quality. The use of SDF is 89% more effective in controlling/arresting caries than other treatments or placebos. The quality of the evidence was graded as high.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000478668

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 216

Authors
Chibinski, A. C., Wambier, L. M., Feltrin, J., Loguercio, A. D., Wambier, D. S., & Reis, A.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (BR)
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
527-541
ISSN
  • 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-976X
OpenAlex
W2761684473
Cited by
216
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Caries Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
silver diamine fluoride, caries arrest, caries progression, primary teeth, pediatric dentistry, caries management
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Child, Dental Caries, Fluorides, Topical, Humans, Silver Compounds, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review