Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Somatic Mosaicism in Fanconi Anemia: Molecular Basis and Clinical Significance

Lo Ten Foe, J.R., Kwee, M.L. *<b, Rooimans, M.A., Oostra, A.B., Veerman, A.J.R., van Weel, M., Pauli, R.M., Shahidi, N.T., Dokal, I., Roberts, I., Altay, C., Gluckman, E., Gibson, R.A., Mathew, C.G, Arwert, F., Joenje, H.·1997·European Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Approximately 25% of patients with Fanconi anemia (FA) have evidence of spontaneously occurring mosaicism as manifest by the presence of two subpopulations of lymphocytes, one of which is hypersensitive to cross-linking agents (e.g. mitomycin C) while the other behaves normally in response to these agents. The molecular basis of this phenotypic reversion has not yet been determined. We have investigated 8 FA patients with evidence of mosaicism. Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines established from these patients exhibited an IC50 for mitomycin C of 25 to > 100 nM compared to a mean of 2 +/- 2 nM for 20 nonmosaic FA patients and 49 +/- 11 nM for 8 healthy controls. In 3 patients who were compound heterozygotes for pathogenic FAC gene mutations the molecular mechanism of the mosaicism was investigated by haplotype analysis. The results indicated that an intragenic mitotic recombination must have occurred leading to a segregation of a wild-type allele in the reverted cells and suggested two patterns of recombination. In 1 patient a single intragenic crossover between the maternally and paternally inherited mutations occurred associated with markers located distally to the FAC gene; in the other 2 patients (sibs) the mechanism appears to have been gene conversion resulting in segregants which have lost one pathogenic mutation. In 6 of the 8 patients the hematological symptoms were relatively mild despite an age range of 9-30 years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000484749

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lo Ten Foe, J. R., Kwee, M. L. *., Rooimans, M. A., Oostra, A. B., Veerman, A. J. R., van Weel, M., Pauli, R. M., Shahidi, N. T., Dokal, I., Roberts, I., Altay, C., Gluckman, E., Gibson, R. A., Mathew, C. G., Arwert, F., & Joenje, H.
Venue
European Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
137-148
ISSN
  • 1018-4813
  • 1476-5438
Cited by
188
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review