Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism in Borderline Personality Disorder
Abstract
Background: Little is known about narcissistic traits in borderline personality disorder (BPD). This exploratory study aimed to illustrate the associations between total, grandiose, and vulnerable narcissism and gender, diagnostic features of BPD and narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), and psychopathology in BPD patients. Sampling and Methods: The Pathological Narcissism Inventory and psychometric measures for impulsivity, anger, borderline symptom severity, personality organization, depression, and rejection sensitivity were completed by 65 BPD patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using the t test, Pearson correlation, and multivariate regression analyses. Results: Male BPD patients displayed higher narcissistic scores than females (p < 0.01). Grandiose narcissism showed a stronger association with NPD than with BPD (p < 0.01) while vulnerable narcissism was only associated with BPD (p < 0.01). Rejection sensitivity (p < 0.01) and depression (p < 0.001) predicted vulnerable narcissism. Conclusion: Vulnerable narcissism is closely associated with BPD and appears to be more dysfunctional than grandiose narcissism. A comprehensive consideration of both traits is recommended. Our results might help to generate hypotheses for further research on pathological narcissism in the spectrum of personality disorders. Future studies are advised to apply complementary measures and take new diagnostic approaches of DSM-5 and ICD-11 into account.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These aspects of narcissism have also been documented within published literature.
“These aspects of narcissism have also been documented within published literature [12, 27, 53, 54].”
From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Grandiose narcissism is related to NPD, but vulnerable narcissism is related to BPD.
“Euler, Stobi [27] found grandiose narcissism to be related to NPD, but vulnerable narcissism to be related to BPD.”
From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Euler, S., Stöbi, D., Sowislo, J., Ritzler, F., Huber, C. G., Lang, U. E., Wrege, J., & Walter, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- Venue
- Psychopathology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-121
- ISSN
- 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-033X
- OpenAlex
- W2794026715
- Semantic Scholar
- f27b2d9d3cbd49c4174629463358606a90e6ac0e
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Business Machines Corporation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, pathological narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, rejection sensitivity, depression, gender differences, personality organization, impulsivity, anger, DSM-5, ICD-11
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Narcissism, Personality Inventory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review