Cited by 93Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementAortic Thrombus and Embolism

The Ongoing Challenge of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

Open access
Luther, Bernd, Mamopoulos, Apostolos, Lehmann, Christian, Klar, Ernst·2018·Visceral Medicine

Abstract

Background: The lethality of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) remains quite high with 50-70%. The main reasons for that are the fact that AMI is rarely taken into consideration by the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, the time-consuming diagnostic process, and the lack of a standardized therapeutic concept. The present interdisciplinary review aims to increase awareness among physicians and to help improve clinical outcomes. Methods: This clinical therapeutic review is based on author expertise as well as a selective literature survey in PubMed based on the term ‘mesenteric ischemia', combined with the terms ‘arterial', ‘clinical presentation', ‘diagnosis', ‘therapy', ‘surgery', and ‘interventional radiology'. Based on these search results as well as on the guidelines of the German Society of Vascular Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, and the American Heart Association, we present an interdisciplinary treatment concept. Results: AMI is a vascular emergency that can be successfully treated only within the first hours after the onset of symptoms. Computed tomography angiography is the diagnostic method of choice. Intensive care unit treatment can prevent the occurrence of multiple organ failure. Treatment primarily consists of the revascularization of the mesenteric arteries. Endovascular techniques should be given priority, whereas signs of peritonitis or a central arterial occlusion with high thrombus load primarily require a surgical approach in order to save time and increase patient safety. Additional bowel resections can play a significant role in the treatment of intestinal sepsis. Conclusion: Prompt and goal-oriented diagnosis and consistent treatment of AMI within 4-6 h from the onset of symptoms can be decisive for the reduction of AMI-associated lethality. In order for this to happen, a standardized concept of emergency treatment needs to be implemented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000490318

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the third phase of AMI, mucosal necrosis occurs followed by infarction of the bowel wall; bacterial translocation leads to gangrene of the intestine, diffuse peritonitis, sepsis and multi-organ failure.

    “In the third phase, mucosal necrosis occurs followed by infarction of the bowel wall. Bacterial translocation leads to gangrene of the intestine, diffuse peritonitis, sepsis and multi-organ failure[26].”

    From Ischemic bowel disease in 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Pathophysiology and Clinical Aspects section (page not provided) describes an irreversible mucosal defect in the final stage, followed by bacterial translocation, intestinal gangrene, diffuse peritonitis, sepsis, and multiple organ failure. It does not explicitly describe mucosal necrosis followed by bowel-wall infarction as a sequence in the third phase. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 93

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Luther B: Akute viszerale Ischämie. Optionale Mögli- chkeiten und Realität. Gefässchirurgie 2006; 11: 167-172.
  2. Paes E, Vollmar JF, Hutschenreiter S, Schoenberg MH, Schölzel E: Diagnostik und Therapie des akuten Mes- enterialinfarktes. Chir Gastroenterol 1990; 6: 473-480.
  3. Walter P, Lindemann W, Koch B, Feifel G: Der akute Mesenterialinfarkt. Klinikarzt 1992; 21: 457-463.
  4. Klar E, Rahmanian PB, Bücker A, Hauenstein K, Jauch KW, Luther B: Acute mesenteric ischemia: a vascular emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 249-256.
  5. Luther B: Intestinalarterien; in Luther B (ed): Techni- ken der offenen Gefäßchirurgie. Standards, Taktiken, Tricks. Berlin, Springer, 2014, pp 199-222.

Authors
Luther, B., Mamopoulos, A., Lehmann, C., & Klar, E.
Affiliations
  • Maria Hilf Krankenhaus (DE)
  • Helios Klinikum Krefeld (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE)
Venue
Visceral Medicine
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2018
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
215-221
ISSN
  • 2297-4725 (ISSN-L)
  • 2297-475X
OpenAlex
W2809185873
Cited by
93
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Visceral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, mesenteric artery occlusion, acute abdomen, CT angiography, endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, multiple organ failure, bowel resection, peritonitis, time to diagnosis, mortality reduction, emergency treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review