Cited by 18Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Decision-Making Skills Moderate the Relationship between Psychological and Physical Pain with Suicidal Behavior in Depressed Patients

Open access
Alacreu-Crespo, Adrián, Olié, Emilie, Seneque, Maude, Béziat, Séverine, Guillaume, Sébastien, Costa, Raquel, Courtet, Philippe·2019·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: Physical and psychological pain play an important role in suicidal behaviour, which may be driven by the desire of relieving pain. Therefore, the decision of not attempting suicide in conditions of high pain involves substantial cognitive resources. Moreover, cognitive processes involved in decision-making might modulate the relationship between pain and suicidal behaviours or depression. Objectives: To investigate the decision-making modulatory role in the relationship between physical and psychological pain and suicidal ideation/act and depression. Methods: For this study, 118 inpatients with depression (77 suicide attempters) self-reported their level of physical and psychological pain, suicidal ideation (current and maximal within the last 15 days), and depressive symptomatology (Beck Depression Inventory questionnaire). Decision-making performance was measured with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Results: In patients with high IGT scores, the levels of maximal psychological pain and suicidal ideation were positively correlated (b = 1.45, p < .001). In the group with low IGT scores, the level of current physical pain was correlated with depression (b = 1.05, p < .005). Conclusion: Better decision-making performance increases the likelihood of suicidal ideation, but not of suicide act in the context of psychological pain, suggesting that suicidal ideation is used as a coping mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000496572

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alacreu-Crespo, A., Olié, E., Seneque, M., Béziat, S., Guillaume, S., Costa, R., & Courtet, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
190-191
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2911511542
Cited by
18
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
decision-making, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, depression, psychological suffering, bodily pain, Iowa Gambling Task, analgesia, cognitive resources
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Decision Making, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Suicide, Attempted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review