Cited by 83Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Brain Structure and Subclinical Symptoms: A Dimensional Perspective of Psychopathology in the Depression and Anxiety Spectrum

Besteher, Bianca, Gaser, Christian, Nenadić, Igor·2020·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

Human psychopathology is the result of complex and subtle neurobiological alterations. Categorial DSM or ICD diagnoses do not allow a biologically founded and differentiated description of these diverse processes across a spectrum or continuum, emphasising the need for a scientific and clinical paradigm shift towards a dimensional psychiatric nosology. The subclinical part of the spectrum is, however, of special interest for early detection of mental disorders. We review the current evidence of brain structural correlates (grey matter volume, cortical thickness, and gyrification) in non-clinical (psychiatrically healthy) subjects with minor depressive and anxiety symptoms. We identified 16 studies in the depressive spectrum and 20 studies in the anxiety spectrum. These studies show effects associated with subclinical symptoms in the hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior insula similar to major depression and changes in amygdala similar to anxiety disorders. Precuneus and temporal areas as parts of the default mode network were affected specifically in the subclinical studies. We derive several methodical considerations crucial to investigations of brain structural correlates of minor psycho(patho)logical symptoms in healthy participants. And we discuss neurobiological overlaps with findings in patients as well as distinct findings, e.g. in areas involved in the default mode network. These results might lead to more insight into the early pathogenesis of clinical significant depression or anxiety and need to be enhanced by multi-centre and longitudinal studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000501024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 128 · Cited by 83

Authors
Besteher, B., Gaser, C., & Nenadić, I.
Affiliations
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019-07-24
Volume
79
Issue
4-5
Pages
270-283
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2964042303
Cited by
83
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
subthreshold depression, subclinical anxiety, brain structure, gray matter volume, cortical thickness, cortical folding, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, default mode network, precuneus, temporal cortex, early detection of mental disorders
MeSH terms
Default Mode Network, Anxiety, Cerebral Cortex, Depression, Humans, Nerve Net, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review