Cited by 39Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsCeliac Disease Research and ManagementThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Levothyroxine absorption test to differentiate pseudomalabsorption from true malabsorption

Open access
Ghosh, Sujoy, Pramanik, Subhodip, Biswas, Kaushik, Bhattacharjee, Kingshuk, Sarkar, Rajib, Chowdhury, Subhankar, Mukhopadhyay, Pradip·2020·European Thyroid Journal

Abstract

Abstract Background: The levothyroxine absorption test for evaluation of pseudomalabsorption in patients with primary hypothyroid is not standardised. An individual in whom a workup for malabsorption is warranted remains undefined. Methods: Twenty-five euthyroid, 25 newly diagnosed hypothyroid, 25 treated hypothyroid with normalised TSH, and 25 hypothyroid subjects with elevated TSH despite adequate dose of levothyroxine for more than 6 months, and 10 euthyroid subjects with true malabsorption were administered levothyroxine (10 μg/kg or maximum 600 μg) to study its absorption profile by measuring free T4 level at hourly intervals for 5 h. Results: Free T4 peaked at 3 h with marginal insignificant decline at 4 h in all groups. The increments of free T4 (between baseline and 3 h) of the four groups (except malabsorption) were not statistically different. The mean increment of free T4 in true malabsorption was 0.39 ng/dL (95% CI: 0.29–0.52) and it was 0.78 ng/dL (95% CI: 0.73–0.85) (10.4 pmol/L) for other groups combined together. The cut off of free T4 increment at 3 h from baseline above 0.40 ng/dL had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 80% (AUC 0.904, p < 0.001) to exclude true malabsorption. Conclusion: Subjects with elevated TSH on adequate dose of LT4 can be reliably diagnosed to be non-adherent to treatment with levothyroxine absorption test. The incremental value above 0.40 ng/dL (5.14 pmol/L) at 3 h may be useful to identify individuals where workup of malabsorption is unwarranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000504218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a cross-sectional study, free T4 increment at 3 h above 5.15 pmol/L had sensitivity 97% and specificity 80% in excluding true malabsorption.

    “These authors reported that free T4 increment at 3 h above 5.15 pmol/L had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 80% in excluding true malabsorption.”
  • The levothyroxine absorption test is not standardized, and multiple protocols have been published with differences regarding test dose, formulations, test durations, frequency of blood collections, analyte, metric, and thresholds for normal absorption.

    “So far, the levothyroxine absorption test is not standardized [7-18], and multiple protocols have been published with differences regarding the test dose, formulations, test durations, frequency of blood collections, analyte (total T4, free T4), metric (absolute or relative peak or increment), and thresholds for normal absorption.”
  • A small proportion of elderly patients and those with heart disease are at risk of angina or cardiac arrhythmia from a higher-than-usual levothyroxine dose.

    “A small proportion of elderly patients and those with heart diseases are at risk of developing angina or cardiac arrhythmia due to a higher-than-usual dose of LT4.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 39

Authors
Ghosh, S., Pramanik, S., Biswas, K., Bhattacharjee, K., Sarkar, R., Chowdhury, S., & Mukhopadhyay, P.
Affiliations
  • 1
  • Biocon (India) (IN)
  • 3
Venue
European Thyroid Journal
Published
2019-11-20
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
19-24
ISSN
  • 2235-0640 (ISSN-L)
  • 2235-0802
OpenAlex
W2990946084
Cited by
39
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Thyroid Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
primary hypothyroidism, free thyroxine, TSH elevation, diagnostic thresholds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review