Levothyroxine absorption test to differentiate pseudomalabsorption from true malabsorption
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background: The levothyroxine absorption test for evaluation of pseudomalabsorption in patients with primary hypothyroid is not standardised. An individual in whom a workup for malabsorption is warranted remains undefined. Methods: Twenty-five euthyroid, 25 newly diagnosed hypothyroid, 25 treated hypothyroid with normalised TSH, and 25 hypothyroid subjects with elevated TSH despite adequate dose of levothyroxine for more than 6 months, and 10 euthyroid subjects with true malabsorption were administered levothyroxine (10 μg/kg or maximum 600 μg) to study its absorption profile by measuring free T4 level at hourly intervals for 5 h. Results: Free T4 peaked at 3 h with marginal insignificant decline at 4 h in all groups. The increments of free T4 (between baseline and 3 h) of the four groups (except malabsorption) were not statistically different. The mean increment of free T4 in true malabsorption was 0.39 ng/dL (95% CI: 0.29–0.52) and it was 0.78 ng/dL (95% CI: 0.73–0.85) (10.4 pmol/L) for other groups combined together. The cut off of free T4 increment at 3 h from baseline above 0.40 ng/dL had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 80% (AUC 0.904, p < 0.001) to exclude true malabsorption. Conclusion: Subjects with elevated TSH on adequate dose of LT4 can be reliably diagnosed to be non-adherent to treatment with levothyroxine absorption test. The incremental value above 0.40 ng/dL (5.14 pmol/L) at 3 h may be useful to identify individuals where workup of malabsorption is unwarranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a cross-sectional study, free T4 increment at 3 h above 5.15 pmol/L had sensitivity 97% and specificity 80% in excluding true malabsorption.
“These authors reported that free T4 increment at 3 h above 5.15 pmol/L had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 80% in excluding true malabsorption.”
From ETA guidelines for the use of levothyroxine sodium preparations in monotherapy to optimize the treatment of hypothyroidism (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
The levothyroxine absorption test is not standardized, and multiple protocols have been published with differences regarding test dose, formulations, test durations, frequency of blood collections, analyte, metric, and thresholds for normal absorption.
“So far, the levothyroxine absorption test is not standardized [7-18], and multiple protocols have been published with differences regarding the test dose, formulations, test durations, frequency of blood collections, analyte (total T4, free T4), metric (absolute or relative peak or increment), and thresholds for normal absorption.”
From Levothyroxine Absorption Test With the Daily Levothyroxine Dose in Patients With “Refractory Hypothyroidism” (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
A small proportion of elderly patients and those with heart disease are at risk of angina or cardiac arrhythmia from a higher-than-usual levothyroxine dose.
“A small proportion of elderly patients and those with heart diseases are at risk of developing angina or cardiac arrhythmia due to a higher-than-usual dose of LT4.”
From Refractory hypothyroidism: unraveling the complexities of diagnosis and management (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Ghosh, S., Pramanik, S., Biswas, K., Bhattacharjee, K., Sarkar, R., Chowdhury, S., & Mukhopadhyay, P.
- Affiliations
- 1
- Biocon (India) (IN)
- 3
- Venue
- European Thyroid Journal
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 2019-11-20
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 2235-0640 (ISSN-L)
- 2235-0802
- PMC
- PMC7024890
- OpenAlex
- W2990946084
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- European Thyroid Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
- Keywords
- primary hypothyroidism, free thyroxine, TSH elevation, diagnostic thresholds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review