Cited by 21Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

HPV Genotype Prevalence and Success of Vaccination to Prevent Cervical Cancer.

Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira, Pimenta, Ruan, Canavez, Juliana, Canavez, Flavio, de Souza, Fernando R., Vara, Ligia, Estivallet, Carmen, Camara-Lopes, Luiz Heraldo·2020·Acta Cytologica

Abstract

Background Nearly 500,000 new cases of cervical cancer are estimated annually worldwide. Three vaccines are currently licensed to prevent cervical cancer. The success of vaccination depends mainly on the prevalence of HPV genotypes, and many cases of HPV infection have been diagnosed after vaccination. Our aim was to search for HPV genotyping in cervical samples to verify the proportion of women that remain susceptible to infection even after vaccination. Methods 21,017 liquid-based cervical (LBC) specimens were received for cytology and HPV detection from 2015 to 2018. Before slide preparations for cytology, a 1,000-μL aliquot was taken from the LBC fixative and subjected to automated DNA extraction and multiplex PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis to detect and classify HPV. Results HPV was detected in 895 (4.3%) specimens. The most prevalent genotype was HPV-16, followed by HPV-58 and HPV-66. A total of 258 (28.8%) cases were positive for high-risk (HR)-HPV types (66, 59, 39, 56, 30, 35, 53, 51, 68, 82, and 70) that are not covered by the HPV vaccines. Conclusion A significant proportion of HPV types detected in cytological specimens are representative of HR-HPV not covered by the available vaccines. The health system should be aware of the considerable percentage of women who are not being immunized and will continue to need cervical cancer screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000506725

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leite, K. R. M., Pimenta, R., Canavez, J., Canavez, F., de Souza, F. R., Vara, L., Estivallet, C., & Camara-Lopes, L. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Genoa (Brazil) (BR)
Venue
Acta Cytologica
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2020
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
420-424
ISSN
  • 0001-5547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2650
OpenAlex
W3014815614
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Cytologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HPV genotypes, cervical cancer, HPV vaccination, vaccination coverage, high-risk HPV, HPV16, HPV58, HPV 66, HPV genotyping, cervical cancer screening, liquid-based cytology
MeSH terms
Adult, Brazil, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cytodiagnosis, DNA, Viral, Female, Genotype, Humans, Vaccination, Prevalence, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review