HPV Genotype Prevalence and Success of Vaccination to Prevent Cervical Cancer.
Abstract
Background Nearly 500,000 new cases of cervical cancer are estimated annually worldwide. Three vaccines are currently licensed to prevent cervical cancer. The success of vaccination depends mainly on the prevalence of HPV genotypes, and many cases of HPV infection have been diagnosed after vaccination. Our aim was to search for HPV genotyping in cervical samples to verify the proportion of women that remain susceptible to infection even after vaccination. Methods 21,017 liquid-based cervical (LBC) specimens were received for cytology and HPV detection from 2015 to 2018. Before slide preparations for cytology, a 1,000-μL aliquot was taken from the LBC fixative and subjected to automated DNA extraction and multiplex PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis to detect and classify HPV. Results HPV was detected in 895 (4.3%) specimens. The most prevalent genotype was HPV-16, followed by HPV-58 and HPV-66. A total of 258 (28.8%) cases were positive for high-risk (HR)-HPV types (66, 59, 39, 56, 30, 35, 53, 51, 68, 82, and 70) that are not covered by the HPV vaccines. Conclusion A significant proportion of HPV types detected in cytological specimens are representative of HR-HPV not covered by the available vaccines. The health system should be aware of the considerable percentage of women who are not being immunized and will continue to need cervical cancer screening.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HPV genotyping is needed to establish the impact of HPV vaccination programs.
“establish the impact of HPV vaccination programs [27, 28]”
From Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay with BD Onclarity HPV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, M., Kim, J., Park, N. J.-Y., & Park, J. Y. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267836 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leite, K. R. M., Pimenta, R., Canavez, J., Canavez, F., de Souza, F. R., Vara, L., Estivallet, C., & Camara-Lopes, L. H.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Genoa (Brazil) (BR)
- Venue
- Acta Cytologica
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 420-424
- ISSN
- 0001-5547 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2650
- OpenAlex
- W3014815614
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Cytologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- HPV genotypes, cervical cancer, HPV vaccination, vaccination coverage, high-risk HPV, HPV16, HPV58, HPV 66, HPV genotyping, cervical cancer screening, liquid-based cytology
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brazil, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cytodiagnosis, DNA, Viral, Female, Genotype, Humans, Vaccination, Prevalence, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Early Detection of Cancer, Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review