Combination of a Probiotic and an Antispasmodic Increases Quality of Life and Reduces Symptoms in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Background: Probiotics and antispasmodics have been tested extensively in the management of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but they have rarely been evaluated in combination. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy of treatment with the probiotic formulation i3.1 (Lactobacillus plantarum CECT7484 and CECT7485 and Pediococcus acidilactici CECT7483), with or without the addition of the antispasmodic alverine/simethicone, in improving IBS-related quality of life (QoL) and reducing abdominal pain and diarrhea in patients with IBS. Methods: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 3 parallel arms (probiotic, probiotic plus antispasmodic, and placebo). Patients with IBS (N = 55) were recruited at the Gastroenterology Department of the Juárez Hospital (México City). QoL was assessed with the IBS-QoL questionnaire, abdominal pain with a visual analog scale, and stool consistency with the Bristol scale. Results: The IBS-QoL rate of response (ITT analysis) was 50.0% for patients in the group with probiotic alone, 68.4% in the group with probiotic plus antispasmodic, and 16.7% in the group with placebo after 6 weeks of treatment (p = 0.005). Response to abdominal pain was reported by 38.9% of patients treated with probiotic, 57.9% with probiotic plus antispasmodic, and 16.7% with placebo (p = 0.035). Regarding stool consistency, a response to treatment was reported by 44.4% of patients treated with probiotic, 57.9% with probiotic plus antispasmodic, and 16.7% with placebo (p = 0.032). Conclusion: The results are consistent with previous studies on the use of the i3.1 probiotic formulation for the management of symptoms in IBS patients, and the addition of an antispasmodic improves its observed effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We updated a prior meta-analysis of 37 RCTs, incorporating data from 8 new trials and randomising 6352 patients.
“We updated a prior meta-analysis of 37 RCTs, 158 incorporating data from 8 new trials [166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173] and randomising 6352 patients.”
From British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [166]
Cites
Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time
Lewis, S. J., & Heaton, K. W. (1997) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3109/00365529709011203 · Cited by 3,244 · see citing works
Global Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
Lovell, R. M., & Ford, A. C. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029 · Cited by 2,155 · see citing works
Martin, C. R., Osadchiy, V., Kalani, A., & Mayer, E. A. (2018) · Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.04.003 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Patrick, D. L., Drossman, D. A., Frederick, I. O., Dicesare, J., & Puder, K. L. (1998) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1018831127942 · Cited by 761 · see citing works
Ford, A. C., Harris, L. A., Lacy, B. E., Quigley, E. M. M., & Moayyedi, P. (2018) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.15001 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Vich Vila, A., Imhann, F., Collij, V., Jankipersadsing, S. A., Gurry, T., Mujagic, Z., Kurilshikov, A., Bonder, M. J., Jiang, X., Tigchelaar, E. F., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aap8914 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Sperber, A. D., Dumitrascu, D., Fukudo, S., Gerson, C., Ghoshal, U. C., Gwee, K. A., Hungin, A. P. S., Kang, J.-Y., Minhu, C., Schmulson, M., et al. (2017) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311240 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome
Vasant, D. H., Paine, P. A., Black, C. J., Houghton, L. A., Everitt, H. A., Corsetti, M., Agrawal, A., Aziz, I., Farmer, A. D., Eugenicos, M. P., et al. (2021) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324598 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barraza-Ortiz, D. A., Pérez-López, N., Medina-López, V. M., Minero-Alfaro, J. I., Zamarripa-Dorsey, F., Fernández-Martínez, N. D. C., Llorente-Ramón, A., & Ramos-Aguilar, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Juárez de México (MX)
- Venue
- Digestive Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2020-08-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 294-300
- ISSN
- 0257-2753 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9875
- OpenAlex
- W3078014614
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digestive Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- irritable bowel syndrome, probiotics, antispasmodic agents, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus acidilactici, simethicone, quality of life, abdominal pain, diarrhea, stool consistency, combination therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parasympatholytics, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Abdominal Pain, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review