Cited by 23Hair Growth and Disordersmelanin and skin pigmentationBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Prediction of the Risk of Alopecia Areata Progressing to Alopecia Totalis and Alopecia Universalis: Biomarker Development with Bioinformatics Analysis and Machine Learning

Zhang, Tao, Nie, Yingli·2022·Dermatology

Abstract

Background Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease typified by nonscarring hair loss with a variable clinical course. Although there is an increased understanding of AA pathogenesis and progress in its treatments, the outcome of AA patients remains unfavorable, especially when they are progressing to the subtypes of alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU). Thus, identifying biomarkers that reflect the risk of AA progressing to AT or AU could lead to better interventions for AA patients. Methods In this study, we conducted bioinformatics analyses to select key genes that correlated to AU or AT based on the whole-genome gene expression of 122 human scalp skin biopsy specimens obtained from NCBI-GEO GSE68801. Then, we built a biomarker using 8 different machine learning (ML) algorithms based on the key genes selected by bioinformatics analyses. Results We identified 4 key genes that significantly increased (CD28) or decreased (HOXC13, KRTAP1-3, and GPRC5D) in AA tissues, especially in the subtypes of AT and AU. Besides, the predictive accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] value) of the prediction models for forecasting AA patients progressing to AT/AU models reached 90.7% (87.9%) by logistic regression, 93.8% (79.9%) by classification trees, 100.0% (76.3%) by random forest, 96.9% (76.3%) by support vector machine, 83.5% (79.9%) by K-nearest neighbors, 97.1% (87.3%) by XGBoost, and 93.3% (80.6%) by neural network algorithms for the training (internal validation) c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000515764

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene expression analysis predicted progression to alopecia universalis, with XGBoost performing best and identifying 4 key genes (CD28, HOXC13, KRTAP1-3, GPRC5D).

    “Zhang and Nie (2022) analyzed gene expression to predict progression to alopecia universalis, with XGBoost performing best for progression risk and identifying 4 key genes associated with disease progression (CD28, HOXC13, KRTAP1-3, GPRC5D).”
  • Connectivity Map analysis of alopecia areata progression genes identified azacitidine and anisomycin as possible repurposed therapies.

    “Zhang and Nie (2022) evaluated key AA progression genes with the Connectivity Map database to identify azacitidine and anisomycin as possible repurposed therapies for AA.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, T., & Nie, Y.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan Union Hospital (CN)
  • Wuhan Children's Hospital (CN)
Venue
Dermatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2021-05-18
Volume
238
Issue
2
Pages
386-396
ISSN
  • 1018-8665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9832
OpenAlex
W3163104567
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
alopecia areata, alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis, disease progression prediction, biomarkers, gene expression, CD28, HOXC13, GPRC5D, machine learning prediction models, drug repurposing, azacitidine, anisomycin
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Alopecia, Alopecia Areata, Humans, Biomarkers, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review