Cited by 0Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques

Enhancing diabetes prediction: integrating machine learning with explainable artificial intelligence

Open access
Jaffar, Shaik Abdul, Siddiqui, Shadab·2026·IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)

Abstract

Early detection of diabetes is critical in preventing disease progression and improving patient outcomes. This work combines Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and machine learning to enhance understanding and prediction of diabetes using the Pima Indian Diabetes Dataset. The machine learning models used in this study are Random Forest, Logistic regression and Gradient Boosting, which resulted in the best accuracy of 93.2%. Some of the pre-processing steps taken were handling of missing data, normalization, feature scaling and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance. Use of SHAP and LIME XAI methods has proven that glucose, BMI and insulin are the most crucial features when it comes to prediction. These techniques further enhance the trust of the clinicians and stakeholders by improving the understanding of how the features contribute to individual predictions, which enhances the model prediction as a whole. The findings prove that there is indeed a marked improvement in the understanding of the machine learning models and their predictions with no compromise on performance. This study highlights the benefits of using XAI in machine learning so that there is accuracy and ease of interpretation with immense power within the developed models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11591/ijai.v15.i3.pp2431-2448

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40

Authors
Jaffar, S. A., & Siddiqui, S.
Affiliations
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (IN)
Venue
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)
Published
2026-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
2431
ISSN
  • 2089-4872 (ISSN-L)
  • 2252-8938
OpenAlex
W7163885116
Cited by
0
References
40
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Keywords
diabetes prediction, explainable AI, SHAP, lime, Pima Indians diabetes dataset, class imbalance, SMOTE, random forest, gradient boosting, logistic regression, feature importance, glucose, body mass index, insulin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review