The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning retention in mathematics over consecutive weeks: Impact of motivated forgetting
Open accessAbstract
Retention is the ability to retain information in the mind, either in short-term or long-term memory. Memory in the long-term is more ideal. Thus, this has become a challenge for educators on how to transfer ideas in short-term memory to long-term memory. To concretize the effect of time on mathematics learning retention, a randomized pre-test post-test x groups design, using matched subjects was used in the study. Seven matched groups of students were identified, and took the pre-test as the basis of the initial amount of learning, after which a group of students was assigned to take the post-test every week for seven weeks. The post-tests results were the basis of the amount of retained learning of the students. The study found out that: i) The amount of retained learning among the students diminished following a negative exponential curve; ii) The amount of retained learning was comparably equal with the initial amount of learning up to the second week; iii) The amount of retained learning became incomparable with the initial amount of learning after the third week; and iv) The concepts in the knowledge level had a great chance to be remembered while the concept with analysis level was prone to motivated forgetting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For instance, the premise that a strict 24 h interval is universally fundamental should be qualified (Valderama & Oligo, 2021;Zhao et al., 2015); this pattern is documented predominantly within non-declarative, procedural motor skill acquisition (Khalafi et al., 2024), whereas explicit conceptual and lexical mastery demonstrates superior consolidation via longer, expanding multi-day schedules (Vag”
From Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Neurodidactic Spaced Learning Strategies in Long-Term Memory (2026) · cites this paper as Valderama & Oligo, 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Cited by 3,725
Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve
Murre, J. M. J., & Dros, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120644 · Cited by 777 · cited 1×
“exponential functions [46], or similar to Ebbinghaus curve [49], [50].”
BackgroundThe many faces of working memory and short-term storage
Cowan, N. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6 · Cited by 724
Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szűcs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-8-33 · Cited by 651
TIMSS 2023 International Results in Mathematics and Science
von Davier, M., Kennedy, A., Reynolds, K., Fishbein, B., Khorramdel, L., Aldrich, C., Bookbinder, A. K., Bezirhan, U., & Yin, L. (2024) · doi:10.6017/lse.tpisc.timss.rs6460 · Cited by 565
Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000079 · Cited by 557
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your learning and Your Life
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 527
Developing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Mathematics
Rittle‐Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014 · Cited by 405
The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W., Yunos, J. M., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Social Science and Humanity · doi:10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.20 · Cited by 358
21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World
OECD (2021) · PISA · doi:10.1787/a83d84cb-en · Cited by 337
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- S. T. Lutz and W. G. Huitt, "Information Processing and Memory: Theory and Applications," in W. Huitt, Ed., Becoming a Brilliant Star: Twelve core ideas supporting holistic education. La Vergne, TN: IngramSpark, 2018, pp. 25-43.
- H. Setiawan "Mathematic questions in PISA relation to mathematics literacy and high order thinking skills," (in Indonesia), Proceedings of the National Mathematics Colloquium, Universitas Jember, 2014, pp. 244-251.
- R. Amalia, "The application of model for proving to increase high order mathematical thinking ability of senior high school students," (in Indonesia), Thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2013.
- J. Yanling and X. Tong, "Learning pyramid theory in the application and practice of flipped classroom," China Educational Technology, vol. 7, pp. 133-138, 2014.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silva Sánchez, M., Lainez Quinde, G. A., & Zambrano Vélez, W. A. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16060962
“For instance, the premise that a strict 24 h interval is universally fundamental should be qualified (Valderama & Oligo, 2021; Zhao et al., 2015); this pattern is documented predominantly within non-declarative, procedural motor skill acquisition (Khalafi et al., 2024), whereas explicit conceptual…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Valderama, J., & Oligo, J.
- Affiliations
- Nueva Vizcaya State University (PH)
- ORCID
- Valderama, Julius
- Venue
- International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
- Published
- 2021-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1245
- ISSN
- 2252-8822 (ISSN-L)
- 2620-5440
- OpenAlex
- W3185642052
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- learning retention, motivated forgetting, mathematics learning, long-term memory, short-term memory, forgetting curve, exponential decay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
