Cited by 23Digital literacy in educationEducational Methods and OutcomesEducational Management and Quality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Paradox on IT Literacy and Science’s Learning Achievement in Secondary School

Open access
Sulisworo, Dwi·2013·International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)

Abstract

Article history: Higher education is currently in the rapid change process.These changes are Received Jun 12, 2013 driven by many factors, both internal and external.Some trends in higher Revised Aug 20, 2013 education development occur on a wider social context.People feel more comfortable with using the internet as a tool in the day-to-day teaching and Accepted Sep 6, 2013 learning activities.Information and communication technologies have an important role to help improve teaching and learning process.The aim of this Keyword: research is to determine whether the student IT literacy medium in uence the learning achievement of sciences subject.This research is a quantitative Science research using multivariate statistical analysis techniques.The result shows Education that IT literacy has no effect on learning achievement.This phenomenon Literacy indicates the paradox on learning and ICT issues.ICT

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11591/ijere.v2i4.2732

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Collis, B. dan Gommer, L. "Stretching the Mold or a New Economy? Part1: Scenarios for the University in 2005", Educational Technology, Vol/Isuue: 41(6). Pp. 5-18, 2001.
  2. Brown dan Duguid (2000) dalam D. Hung. "Design Principles for Web-Based Learning: Implications from Vygotskian Thought", Educational Technology, Vol/Issue: 41(3), 2001.
  3. Hung, D. "Design Principles for Web-Based Learning: Implications from Vygotskian Thought", Educational Technology, Vol/Issue: 41(6), 2001.
  4. Farajollahi, M., & Moenikia, M. "The effect of computer-based learning on distance learners' self regulated learning strategies", World Journal on Educational Technology, Vol/Issue: 3(1). Pp. 28-38, 2011.
  5. Crampton, A., Ragusa, A. T., & Cavanagh, H. "Cross-discipline investigation of the relationship between academic performance and online resource access by distance education students", Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 20. Pp. 1-13, 2012.
  6. Fry, N., & Love, N. "Business lecturers' perceptions and interactions with the virtual learning environment", International Journal of Management Education, Vol/Issue: 9( 4). Pp. 51-56, 2011.
  7. Darwin, W. "Potret Pengguna Internet Indonesia 2012", Marketeers. Pp. 60-64, 2012.
  8. Sangrà, A., & González-Sanmamed, M. "The role of information and communication technologies in improving teaching and learning processes in primary and secondary schools", ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, Vol/Issue: 18(3). Pp. 207-220, 2010.
  9. BIOGRAPHY OF AUTHOR Assoc. Prof. Dr. Dwi Sulisworo. His major eld of research is in e-learning and mobile learning. He graduated from Institute Technology Bandung and Malang State University. He works at Physics Education Department, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia. Email: dsw_uad@yahoo.com IJERE Vol. 2, No. 4, December 2013 : 149 -152 sources: 1 126 words / 8% -Internet from 02-Mar-2016 12:00AM www.macrothink.org 2 42 words / 3% -Internet from 25-Jun-2017 12:00AM documents.mx 3 32 words / 2% -Internet from 13-Aug-2014 12:00AM www.iaesjournal.com 4 26 words / 2% -Internet from 07-Jul-2017 12:00AM eprints.uny.ac.id 5 14 words / 1% -Internet from 04-Dec-2016 12:00AM les.eric.ed.gov 6 13 words / 1% -Internet from 09-Feb-2014 12:00AM www.gjimt.ac.in 7 11 words / 1% -Internet from 06-Feb-2017 12:00AM les.eric.ed.gov

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sulisworo, D.
Affiliations
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (ID)
Corresponding author
Sulisworo, Dwi
Venue
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
Published
2013-12-01
Volume
2
Issue
4
ISSN
2252-8822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031706338
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) (publishedVersion)
  • Selamat Datang di Repository UAD (Universitas Ahmad Dahlan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Management and Quality
Keywords
computer literacy, science learning achievement, high school students, information and communication technology in education, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review