The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures
Abstract
Summary: There have been no comprehensive studies that have compared the incidence of symptomatic VTE over a spectrum of different urgent or elective surgical procedures. In this study we determined the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (VTE) within a 3 month period after 76 different surgical procedures. Using a large administrative data-base, we analyzed 1,653,275 cases that underwent one of 76 selected surgical procedures between January 1, 1992 and September 30, 1996. The principal outcomes were venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, during either the initial hospitalization or a re-hospitalization for VTE within 91 days of the date of surgery. Predictors of VTE were analyzed using logistic regression. Overall, VTE was diagnosed in 13,533 cases (0.8%, 95% CI = 0.7-0.9%) and of these, 5049 (37%, 95% CI = 36-38%) had pulmonary embolism. Predictors of VTE included: advancing age (OR=1.1 per 5 year increment in age, 95% CI =1.1-1.1), Latino ethnicity (OR = 0.9, 95% CI =0.8-0.9), Asian/Pacific Islander ethnicity (OR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.4-0.6), presence of a malignancy (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.6-1.8) and prior VTE (OR = 6.2, 95% CI = 5.5-7.0). High-risk procedures that had an incidence of symptomatic VTE of approximately 2 to 3% included invasive neurosurgery, total hip arthroplasty, major vascular surgery and radical cystectomy. Fifty-six percent of all VTE events diagnosed within 91 days of surgery occurred after discharge. The findings of this study provide a basis for categorizing different surgical procedures as low, intermediate, high and very high risk for VTE. Because of the high incidence of VTE diagnosed after hospital discharge, further studies of extended thromboprophylaxis appear warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kahn (2012) · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2296 · Cited by 2,693
The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism
White, R. H. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000078468.11849.66 · Cited by 2,310
Self-citationVTE, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy
Bates, S. M., Greer, I. A., Middeldorp, S., Veenstra, D. L., Prabulos, A.-M., & Vandvik, P. O. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2300 · Cited by 1,525
Batchelor, T. J. P., Rasburn, N. J., Abdelnour-Berchtold, E., Brunelli, A., Cerfolio, R. J., Gonzalez, M., Ljungqvist, O., Petersen, R. H., Popescu, W. M., Slinger, P. D., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy301 · Cited by 1,366
Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis
Timp, J. F., Braekkan, S. K., Versteeg, H. H., & Cannegieter, S. C. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2013-04-460121 · Cited by 1,205
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, H., Romano, P., & White, R.
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 446-455
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W2063570477
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1160/th03-03-0152
- The paper
- Zhou, H., Romano, P., & White, R. (2003). Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1160/th03-03-0152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.