Bleeding and re-thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome on oral anticoagulation: An 8-year longitudinal comparison with mitral valve replacement and inherited thrombophilia
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare bleeding and re-thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS), mitral valve replacement (MVR) and inherited thrombophilia (IT) at different oral anticoagulation intensities. It entailed a prospective 8-year follow-up on 67 patients with PAPS, 89 with IT and 24 with MVR. Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies detected by Elisa and lupus anticoagulant by clotting assays. At INR 2-3 minor bleeding rate was higher in MVR (33.3) than PAPS (10.9) and IT (4.2)(p<0.0001). At INR 3-4 minor bleeding rate was higher in PAPS (142) than IT (33.3) and MVR (5.8)(p<0.0001). At either INR major bleeding rate were not significantly different across the three groups, but in PAPS major and minor bleeding rates were superior at INR 3-4 than INR 2-3 (p=0.02 and p<0.0001). Re-thrombosis rate was higher in PAPS than IT at INR 2-3 (4.0 vs 0.35) (p=0.01) and at INR 3-4 (10.5 vs. nil). The hazard ratio for re-thrombosis between PAPS and IT was 13 (95% IC 1.6-102.2, p=0.015). By regression analysis, baseline IgG aCL titre (>80 GPL) p=0.001) and male sex (p=0.03) independently predicted re-thrombosis. In conclusion, in PAPS, high intensity oral anticoagulation was not superior to conventional intensity in preventing re-thrombosis but was offset by greater bleeding rates. Male sex and elevated baseline IgG aCL predicted rethrombosis in PAPS that is 13-fold more re-thrombogenic than IT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and first venous thrombosis, there is no additional benefit of a vitamin K antagonist target INR of 3-4 versus 2-3, based on an RCT and pooled data from five studies that included a majority with venous events.
“Data from an RCT21 reporting exclusively on patients with venous events and pooled data from five studies that included a majority with venous events21–25 showed no additional benefit of a target INR of 3–4 vs INR of 2–3.”
From EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults (2019) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Ciampa, A., Margaglione, M., Scenna, G., Iannaccone, L., Brancaccio, V., & Ames, P. R. J.
- Affiliations
- Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati (IT)
- University of Foggia (IT)
- Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli (IT)
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 694-699
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W2087266162
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
- Keywords
- primary antiphospholipid syndrome, oral anticoagulation, hemorrhage, rethrombosis, mitral valve replacement, inherited thrombophilia, anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, major bleeding, minor bleeding
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anticoagulants, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Family Health, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Mitral Valve, Predictive Value of Tests, Recurrence, Thrombosis, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Thrombophilia, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review