Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: An updated meta-analysis

Open access
Marcucci, Rossella, Gori, Anna Maria, Giusti, Betti, Abbate, Rosanna, Gensini, Gian Franco, Sofi, Francesco·2010·Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Summary: We performed this meta-analysis to update the clinical evidences on the relation between clopidogrel non-responsiveness and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. An electronic literature search through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library and bibliographies of retrieved articles up to January, 2009 was conducted. Studies were included if they had a cohort prospective design, if they analysed clopidogrel responsiveness in CAD patients in relation to death and/or occurrence of adverse coronary events during follow-up, and if they reported an adequate statistical analysis. Fourteen studies, totalling 4,564 CAD patients followed for a time ranging from 14 days to one year, were included. The cumulative analysis reported that residual platelet reactivity despite clopidogrel treatment was significantly associated with an increased risk of death and/or thrombotic recurrences (odds ratio [OR] 5.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97 to 10.84; p<0.00001). However, four studies contributed to a consistent heterogeneity of the model and evidenced a significant risk of publication bias, so were excluded from the analysis. This exclusion, however, did not influence the overall result, by confirming the increased risk of cardiovascular recurrences for patients with a poor response to clopidogrel treatment (OR 3.58, 95%CI 2.54 to 5.05; p<0.00001). The present updated meta-analysis documents a significant association between residual platelet reactivity under clopidogrel treatment and recurrent cardiovascular events, so suggesting the relevance of ongoing interventional studies aimed at tailoring the antithrombotic therapy in CAD patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1160/th09-06-0418

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Marcucci, R., Gori, A. M., Giusti, B., Abbate, R., Gensini, G. F., & Sofi, F.
Venue
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2010
Volume
103
Issue
04
Pages
00-00
ISSN
  • 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
  • 2567-689X
OpenAlex
W1846544090
Cited by
200
References
3
FWCI
22.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: An updated meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1160/th09-06-0418
The paper
Marcucci, R., Gori, A. M., Giusti, B., Abbate, R., Gensini, G. F., & Sofi, F. (2010). Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: An updated meta-analysis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1160/th09-06-0418

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.