Cited by 12Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsOil Palm Production and Sustainability

‘Spillover effects of blacklisting policy in the Brazilian Amazon’

Open access
Andrade, Luiza Cardoso de·2017

Abstract

versão espacial do estimador para corrigir a dependência

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11606/d.12.2016.tde-29112016-161123

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have documented that the impact of conservation efforts may extend beyond direct effects and programme borders.

    “However, recent studies have further documented that the impact of conservation efforts may extend beyond direct effects and programme borders, as inputs can be spatially reallocated and interventions can interact with both geographical features and other policies (Herrera, 2015; Andrade, 2016; Pfaff and Robalino, 2017; Robalino et al., 2017).”
  • Enforcement operations could account for documented spillover effects from blacklisting on neighbouring municipalities.

    “The same reasoning applies to enforcement operations, which could account for documented spillover effects from blacklisting on neighbouring municipalities (Andrade, 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. AMBIENTE, M. Ministério do M. Brazilian policy to tackle deforestation in the amazon. In: Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. [
  2. ANSELIN, L.; ARRIBAS-BEL, D. Spatial fixed effects and spatial dependence in a single cross-section. Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Online Library, v. 92, n. 1, p. 3-17, 2013.
  3. S.l.]: Springer, 1995. p. 21-74. 40, 47
  4. ARIMA, E. Y. et al. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from brazil. Land Use Policy, Elsevier, v. 41, p. 465-473, 2014. 19, 23
  5. BUTLER, J.; MOSER, C. Cloud cover and satellite images of deforestation. Land economics, University of Wisconsin Press, v. 83, n. 2, p. 166-173, 2007.
  6. CHOMITZ, K. M.; THOMAS, T. S. Determinants of land use in amazonia: a fine-scale spatial analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1016-1028, 2003. 21, 35
  7. ELHORST, J. P. Spatial econometrics: from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. [S.l.]: Springer, 2014. 39, 40
  8. FLORAX, R. J.; FOLMER, H.; REY, S. J. Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of hendry's methodology. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, v. 33, n. 5, p. 557-579, 2003. 40, 47
  9. GRAY, W. B.; SHIMSHACK, J. P. The effectiveness of environmental monitoring and enforcement: A review of the empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Oxford University Press, v. 5, n. 1, p. 3-24, 2011.
  10. HARGRAVE, J.; KIS-KATOS, K. Economic causes of deforestation in the brazilian amazon: A panel data analysis for the 2000s. Environmental and Resource Economics, Springer, v. 54, n. 4, p. 471-494, 2013. 19, 21, 23, 27, 35
  11. IPCC. Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations, and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  12. LESAGE, J.; PACE, R. K. Introduction to spatial econometrics. [S.l.]: CRC press, 2010.
  13. PFAFF, A. What drives deforestation in the brazilian amazon?: evidence from satellite and socioeconomic data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, v. 37, n. 1, p. 26-43, 1999. 21, 31, 35, 44
  14. ROBALINO, J. A. Land conservation policies and income distribution: who bears the burden of our environmental efforts? Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge Univ Press, v. 12, n. 04, p. 521-533, 2007.
  15. ROBALINO, J. A.; PFAFF, A. Contagious development: Neighbor interactions in deforestation. Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, v. 97, n. 2, p. 427-436, 2012. 21, 35
  16. RUSSELL, C. S. et al. Enforcing pollution control laws. [S.l.]: Routledge, 2013.
  17. SHIMSHACK, J. P.; WARD, M. B. Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, v. 50, n. 3, p. 519-540, 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrade, L. C. D.
Published
2016-12-20
OpenAlex
W2596960478
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
spillover effects, Brazilian Amazon, deforestation, environmental policy, spatial dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review