Cited by 48Temporomandibular Joint DisordersFacial Trauma and Fracture ManagementDental Trauma and Treatments

Temporomandibular Disorder Pain After Whiplash Trauma: A Systematic Review

Open access
Häggman-Henrikson, Birgitta, List, Thomas, Westergren, Hans, Axelsson, Susanna·2013·Journal of Orofacial Pain

Abstract

Aims To assess, by systematic review of the literature, (1) the prevalence and incidence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain after whiplash trauma, and (2) whether treatment modalities commonly used for TMD are equally effective in patients with solely TMD pain and those with TMD/whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) pain. Methods A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Bandolier databases was conducted from January 1966 through October 2012. The systematic search identified 125 articles. After an initial screening of abstracts, 45 articles were reviewed in full text. Two investigators evaluated the methodological quality of each identified study. Results Eight studies on prevalence/incidence of TMD pain in WAD and four studies on interventions in TMD pain and WAD met the inclusion criteria. The reported median prevalence of TMD pain after whiplash trauma was 23% (range 2.4% to 52%) and the incidence ranged from 4% to 34%. For healthy controls, the reported median prevalence was 3% (range 2.5% to 8%) and the incidence ranged from 4.7% to 7%. For patients with a combination of TMD pain and WAD, treatment modalities conventionally used for TMD, such as jaw exercises and occlusal splints, had less of an effect (median improvement rate of 48%, range 13% to 68%) compared to TMD patients without a whiplash injury (75%, range 51% to 91%). Conclusion There is some evidence that prevalence and incidence of TMD pain is increased after whiplash trauma. The…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11607/jop.1027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Häggman-Henrikson, B., List, T., Westergren, H., & Axelsson, S.
Venue
Journal of Orofacial Pain
Published
2013
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
217-226
ISSN
1064-6655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1955953796
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Orofacial Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, jaw exercises, occlusal splint, treatment outcomes, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Therapy, Facial Pain, Humans, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Whiplash Injuries, Incidence, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Occlusal Splints, Arthralgia, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review