The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atherosclerosis susceptibility differences among progenitors of recombinant inbred strains of mice.
Open accessAbstract
Female mice of 16 inbred mouse strains were fed an atherogenic diet for 14 weeks and were then evaluated for atherosclerotic lesions in the aorta. Strains C57BL/6, C57BR/cd, C57L, and SM were very susceptible to atherosclerosis, with lesion area/aortic cross-sections in the range of 4500 to 8000 microns 2. Strains C58 and SWR were intermediate in susceptibility, with lesion area/sections in the range of 1670 to 1690 microns 2. Strains 129, AKR, DBA/2, and BALB/c had only small lesions in the range of 20 to 350 microns 2/section; strains C3H, NZB, CBA, HRS, SJL, and A had no lesions after 14 weeks. Lesion formation in five strains was compared at several time points. Strain C57BL/6 mice developed lesions by 7 weeks, and these continued to grow until all mice had large atheromatous plaques in the aorta and coronary arteries. Strains AKR and DBA/2 also had fatty streak lesions as early as 7 or 8 weeks, but these lesions had not progressed in size by 14 weeks. Strains BALB/c and C3H, which were both resistant to lesion formation at 14 weeks, diverged from each other as time progressed. By 1 year, BALB/c mice had large lesions, but C3H mice had none. Most of the inbred strains chosen for evaluation are the progenitors of recombinant inbred sets of strains, a genetic tool that greatly facilitates the analysis of strain differences. This survey indicates seven additional recombinant inbred sets of strains whose progenitors differ in atherosclerosis susceptibility: BXD, AKXL, SWXJ, NX8, 129XB, NXSM, and B6NXAKRN. An analysis of these recombinant inbred strains may reveal additional mouse genes affecting atherosclerosis susceptibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ApoE-deficient mice develop lesions of all phases of atherosclerosis throughout the arterial tree.
Nakashima, Y., Plump, A. S., Raines, E. W., Breslow, J. L., & Ross, R. (1994) · Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.14.1.133 · Cited by 1,693
Newby, A. C. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2003 · Cited by 817
Atherosclerosis in mice lacking apo E. Evaluation of lesional development and progression
Reddick, R. L., Zhang, S. H., & Maeda, N. (1994) · Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.14.1.141 · Cited by 633
Liver X receptors in lipid metabolism: opportunities for drug discovery
Hong, C., & Tontonoz, P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4280 · Cited by 587
Napoli, C., Martin-Padura, I., de Nigris, F., Giorgio, M., Mansueto, G., Somma, P., Condorelli, M., Sica, G., De Rosa, G., & Pelicci, P. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0336359100 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Paigen, B., Ishida, B. Y., Verstuyft, J., Winters, R. B., & Albee, D.
- Venue
- Arteriosclerosis: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association, Inc.
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-323
- ISSN
- 0276-5047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025047972
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atherosclerosis susceptibility differences among progenitors of recombinant inbred strains of mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.atv.10.2.316
- The paper
- Paigen, B., Ishida, B. Y., Verstuyft, J., Winters, R. B., & Albee, D. (1990). Atherosclerosis susceptibility differences among progenitors of recombinant inbred strains of mice. Arteriosclerosis: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.10.2.316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.