Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 495

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus Conference Report: Maximizing Use of Organs Recovered From the Cadaver Donor: Cardiac Recommendations: March 28–29, 2001, Crystal City, Va

Zaroff, Jonathan G., Rosengard, Bruce R., Armstrong, William F., Babcock, Wayne D., D’Alessandro, Anthony, Dec, G. William, Edwards, Niloo M., Higgins, Robert S., Jeevanandum, Valluvan, Kauffman, Myron, Kirklin, James K., Large, Stephen R., Marelli, Daniel, Peterson, Tammie S., Ring, W. Steves, Robbins, Robert C., Russell, Stuart D., Taylor, David O., Van Bakel, Adrian, Wallwork, John, Young, James B.·2002·Circulation

Abstract

The shortage of available donor hearts continues to limit cardiac transplantation. For this reason, strict criteria have limited the number of patients placed on the US waiting list to ≈6000 to 8000 per year. Because the number of available donor hearts has not increased beyond ≈2500 per year, the transplant waiting list mortality rate remains substantial. Suboptimal and variable utilization of donor hearts has compounded the problem in the United States. In 1999, the average donor yield from 55 US regions was 39%, ranging from 19% to 62%. This report provides the detailed cardiac recommendations from the conference on “Maximizing Use of Organs Recovered From the Cadaver Donor” held March 28 to 29, 2001, in Crystal City, Va. The specific objective of the report is to provide recommendations to improve the evaluation and successful utilization of potential cardiac donors. The report describes the accuracy of current techniques such as echocardiography in the assessment of donor heart function before recovery and the impact of these data on donor yield. The rationale for and specific details of a donor-management pathway that uses pulmonary artery catheterization and hormonal resuscitation are provided. Administrative recommendations such as enhanced communication strategies among transplant centers and organ-procurement organizations, financial incentives for organ recovery, and expansion of donor database fields for research are also described.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000025587.40373.75

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 495

Metadata

Authors
Zaroff, J. G., Rosengard, B. R., Armstrong, W. F., Babcock, W. D., D’Alessandro, A., Dec, G. W., Edwards, N. M., Higgins, R. S., Jeevanandum, V., Kauffman, M., Kirklin, J. K., Large, S. R., Marelli, D., Peterson, T. S., Ring, W. S., Robbins, R. C., Russell, S. D., Taylor, D. O., Van Bakel, A., Wallwork, J., & Young, J. B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-08-13
Volume
106
Issue
7
Pages
836-841
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2098016433
Cited by
495
References
6
FWCI
22.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Conference Report: Maximizing Use of Organs Recovered From the Cadaver Donor: Cardiac Recommendations: March 28–29, 2001, Crystal City, Va. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000025587.40373.75
The paper
Zaroff, J. G., Rosengard, B. R., Armstrong, W. F., Babcock, W. D., D’Alessandro, A., Dec, G. W., Edwards, N. M., Higgins, R. S., Jeevanandum, V., Kauffman, M., Kirklin, J. K., Large, S. R., Marelli, D., Peterson, T. S., Ring, W. S., Robbins, R. C., Russell, S. D., Taylor, D. O., Van Bakel, A., . . . Young, J. B. (2002). Consensus Conference Report: Maximizing Use of Organs Recovered From the Cadaver Donor: Cardiac Recommendations: March 28–29, 2001, Crystal City, Va. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000025587.40373.75

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.