The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: Six-Month Results
Abstract
Background— Stent implantation for obstructive femoropopliteal artery disease has been associated with poor long-term outcomes. This study evaluated the effectiveness of shape memory alloy recoverable technology (SMART) nitinol self-expanding stents coated with a polymer impregnated with sirolimus (rapamycin) versus uncoated SMART stents in superficial femoral artery obstructions. Methods and Results— Thirty-six patients were recruited for this double-blind, randomized, prospective trial. All patients had chronic limb ischemia and femoral artery occlusions (57%) or stenoses (average lesion length, 85±57 mm). Patients were eligible for randomization after successful guidewire passage across the lesion. Eighteen patients received sirolimus-eluting SMART stents and 18 patients received uncoated SMART stents. The primary end point of the study was the in-stent mean percent diameter stenosis, as measured by quantitative angiography at 6 months. The in-stent mean percent diameter stenosis was 22.6% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group versus 30.9% in the uncoated stent group ( P =0.294). The in-stent mean lumen diameter was significantly larger in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (4.95 mm versus 4.31 mm in the uncoated stent group; P =0.047). No serious adverse events (death or prolonged hospitalization) were reported. Conclusions— The use of sirolimus-eluting SMART stents for superficial femoral artery occlusion is feasible, with a trend toward reducing late loss compared with uncoated stents. The coated stent also proved to be safe and was not associated with any serious adverse events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)
Norgren, L., Hiatt, W. R., Dormandy, J. A., Nehler, M. R., Harris, K. A., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (2007) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037 · Cited by 8,191
Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review
Sun, L., Huang, W. M., Ding, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, C. C., Purnawali, H., & Tang, C. (2012) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.065 · Cited by 1,105
Local Delivery of Paclitaxel to Inhibit Restenosis during Angioplasty of the Leg
Tepe, G., Zeller, T., Albrecht, T., Heller, S., Schwarzwälder, U., Beregi, J.-P., Claussen, M. D. C. D., Oldenburg, A., Scheller, B., & Speck, U. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0706356 · Cited by 803
Self-citationDuda, S. H., Bosiers, M., Lammer, J., Scheinert, D., Zeller, T., Oliva, V., Tielbeek, A., Anderson, J., Wiesinger, B., Tepe, G., et al. (2006) · Journal of Endovascular Therapy · doi:10.1583/05-1704.1 · Cited by 490
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duda, S. H., Pusich, B., Richter, G., Landwehr, P., Oliva, V. L., Tielbeek, A., Wiesinger, B., Hak, J. B., Tielemans, H., Ziemer, G., Cristea, E., Lansky, A., & Bérégi, J. P.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-09-17
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1505-1509
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2110352874
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: Six-Month Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000029746.10018.36
- The paper
- Duda, S. H., Pusich, B., Richter, G., Landwehr, P., Oliva, V. L., Tielbeek, A., Wiesinger, B., Hak, J. B., Tielemans, H., Ziemer, G., Cristea, E., Lansky, A., & Bérégi, J. P. (2002). Sirolimus-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: Six-Month Results. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000029746.10018.36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.