The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Human Atherosclerosis by Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
Background— High-resolution visualization of atherosclerotic plaque morphology may be essential for identifying coronary plaques that cause acute coronary events. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality capable of providing cross-sectional images of tissue with a resolution of 10 μm. To date, OCT imaging has not been investigated in sufficient detail to assess its accuracy for characterizing atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of this study was to establish objective OCT image criteria for atherosclerotic plaque characterization in vitro. Methods and Results— OCT images of 357 (diseased) atherosclerotic arterial segments obtained at autopsy were correlated with histology. OCT image criteria for 3 types of plaque were formulated by analysis of a subset (n=50) of arterial segments. OCT images of fibrous plaques were characterized by homogeneous, signal-rich regions; fibrocalcific plaques by well-delineated, signal-poor regions with sharp borders; and lipid-rich plaques by signal-poor regions with diffuse borders. Independent validation of these criteria by 2 OCT readers for the remaining segments (n=307) demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity ranging from 71% to 79% and 97% to 98% for fibrous plaques, 95% to 96% and 97% for fibrocalcific plaques, and 90% to 94% and 90% to 92% for lipid-rich plaques, respectively (overall agreement, κ=0.83 to 0.84). The interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of OCT assessment were high (κ values of 0.88 and 0.91, respectively). Conclusions— Objective OCT criteria are highly sensitive and specific for characterizing different types of atherosclerotic plaques. These results represent an important step in validating this new intravascular imaging modality and will provide a basis for the interpretation of intracoronary OCT images obtained from patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Cited by
Madhavan, M. V., Tarigopula, M., Mintz, G. S., Maehara, A., Stone, G. W., & Généreux, P. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.017 · Cited by 579
Comprehensive volumetric optical microscopy in vivo
Yun, S. H., Tearney, G. J., Vakoc, B. J., Shishkov, M., Oh, W. Y., Desjardins, A. E., Suter, M. J., Chan, R. C., Evans, J. A., Jang, I.-K., et al. (2006) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1450 · Cited by 438
Self-citationYamano, T., Kubo, T., Shiono, Y., Shimamura, K., Orii, M., Tanimoto, T., Matsuo, Y., Ino, Y., Kitabata, H., Yamaguchi, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis · doi:10.5551/jat.25593 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Yabushita, H., Bouma, B. E., Houser, S. L., Aretz, H. T., Jang, I.-K., Schlendorf, K. H., Kauffman, C. R., Shishkov, M., Kang, D.-H., Halpern, E. F., & Tearney, G. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-09-24
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1640-1645
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2134254671
- Cited by
- 1,246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Human Atherosclerosis by Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000029927.92825.f6
- The paper
- Yabushita, H., Bouma, B. E., Houser, S. L., Aretz, H. T., Jang, I.-K., Schlendorf, K. H., Kauffman, C. R., Shishkov, M., Kang, D.-H., Halpern, E. F., & Tearney, G. J. (2002). Characterization of Human Atherosclerosis by Optical Coherence Tomography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000029927.92825.f6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.