The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sequential Versus Simultaneous Biventricular Resynchronization for Severe Heart Failure: Evaluation by Tissue Doppler Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Background— Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by means of simultaneous biventricular pacing improves left ventricular systolic performance and synchrony in patients with heart failure and bundle-branch block. We used tissue tracking and 3D echocardiography to evaluate the impact of sequential CRT with individualized interventricular delay programming. Methods and Results— Twenty consecutive patients with severe heart failure and left bundle-branch block were included. Tissue tracking and 3D echocardiography were carried out before and on the day after pacemaker implantation. Eleven different interventricular delays were examined in each patient. Patients were reexamined after 3 months. Simultaneous CRT immediately reduced the extent of myocardium displaying delayed longitudinal contraction (DLC) from 48.6±16% to 23.2±13% ( P <0.01) and increased left ventricular ejection fraction percentage (LVEF%) from 22.4±6% to 29.7±5% ( P <0.01). However, optimum sequential CRT caused a further reduction in the extent of DLC from 23.2±13% to 11.1±7.2% ( P <0.01), with a simultaneous increase in LVEF% (from 29.7±5% to 33.9±6%, P <0.01). Three months of optimum sequential CRT further improved LVEF% (from 33.6±6% to 38.6±7.2%, P <0.01). Tissue tracking detected the segments with DLC, and their location determined optimum interventricular delay programming. Compared with simultaneous CRT, sequential CRT increased diastolic filling time by 7±2.5%. Conclusions— Compared with simultaneous CRT, sequential CRT significantly improves left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance. Tissue tracking can be used to select optimum interventricular delay during CRT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pitzalis, M. V., Iacoviello, M., Romito, R., Guida, P., De Tommasi, E., Luzzi, G., Anaclerio, M., Forleo, C., & Rizzon, P. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.058 · Cited by 284
Strocchi, M., Wijesuriya, N., Elliott, M. K., Gillette, K., Neic, A., Mehta, V., Vigmond, E. J., Plank, G., Rinaldi, C. A., & Niederer, S. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.1049214 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Sogaard, P., Egeblad, H., Pedersen, A. K., Kim, W. Y., Kristensen, B. Ø., Hansen, P. S., & Mortensen, P. T.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-10-15
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2078-2084
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2169799235
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequential Versus Simultaneous Biventricular Resynchronization for Severe Heart Failure: Evaluation by Tissue Doppler Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000034512.90874.8e
- The paper
- Sogaard, P., Egeblad, H., Pedersen, A. K., Kim, W. Y., Kristensen, B. Ø., Hansen, P. S., & Mortensen, P. T. (2002). Sequential Versus Simultaneous Biventricular Resynchronization for Severe Heart Failure: Evaluation by Tissue Doppler Imaging. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000034512.90874.8e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.