The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coronary Artery Pattern and Outcome of Arterial Switch Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background— Prior studies of coronary pattern and outcome after arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) have been hindered by limited statistical power. This meta-analysis assesses the effect of coronary anatomy on post-ASO mortality, both overall and adjusted for time. Methods and Results— A literature search revealed 9 independent series that reported post-ASO mortality by coronary pattern in a total of 1942 patients. Odds ratios comparing all-cause mortality in patients with usual versus variant coronary patterns were calculated and combined by use of an empirical Bayesian model. Single coronary patterns, both of which loop around the great vessels, were associated with significant mortality (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.8), whereas looping patterns that arose from 2 separate ostia were not (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.9). This latter group includes patients with the most common variant, circumflex from right coronary artery. Patients with an intramural coronary artery had the greatest mortality (OR 6.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 14.2). Overall, patients with any variant coronary pattern had nearly twice the mortality seen in those with the usual pattern (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.4). Single ostium patterns and intramural coronary arteries remained associated with significant added mortality after adjustment for time-trend effects. Conclusions— Over the past 2 decades, patients with common coronary variants have undergone ASO without added mortality compared with those with the usual coronary pattern. Those with intramural or single coronary arteries have significant added mortality that has persisted over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
Warnes, C. A., Williams, R. G., Bashore, T. M., Child, J. S., Connolly, H. M., Dearani, J. A., del Nido, P., Fasules, J. W., Graham, T. P., Hijazi, Z. M., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.001 · Cited by 1,533
Detection of Transposition of the Great Arteries in Fetuses Reduces Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality
Bonnet, D., Coltri, A., Butera, G., Fermont, L., Le Bidois, J., Kachaner, J., & Sidi, D. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.7.916 · Cited by 760
D-Transposition of the Great Arteries
Villafañe, J., Lantin-Hermoso, M. R., Bhatt, A. B., Tweddell, J. S., Geva, T., Nathan, M., Elliott, M. J., Vetter, V. L., Paridon, S. M., Kochilas, L., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1150 · Cited by 290
Han, B. K., Rigsby, C. K., Hlavacek, A., Leipsic, J., Nicol, E. D., Siegel, M. J., Bardo, D., Abbara, S., Ghoshhajra, B., Lesser, J. R., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.004 · Cited by 211
Anderson, B. R., Ciarleglio, A. J., Hayes, D. A., Quaegebeur, J. M., Vincent, J. A., & Bacha, E. A. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1645 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Pasquali, S. K., Hasselblad, V., Li, J. S., Kong, D. F., & Sanders, S. P.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-11-12
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2575-2580
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2037165622
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary Artery Pattern and Outcome of Arterial Switch Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000036745.19310.bb
- The paper
- Pasquali, S. K., Hasselblad, V., Li, J. S., Kong, D. F., & Sanders, S. P. (2002). Coronary Artery Pattern and Outcome of Arterial Switch Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Meta-Analysis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000036745.19310.bb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.