Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anti-Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Gene Therapy Limits Progression and Destabilization of Established Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E–Knockout Mice

Inoue, Shujiro, Egashira, Kensuke, Ni, Weihua, Kitamoto, Shiro, Usui, Makoto, Otani, Kisho, Ishibashi, Minako, Hiasa, Ken-ichi, Nishida, Ken-ichi, Takeshita, Akira·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Monocyte infiltration into the arterial wall and its activation is the central event in atherogenesis. Thus, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) might be a novel therapeutic target against atherogenesis. We and others recently reported that blockade or abrogation of the MCP-1 pathway attenuates the initiation of atheroma formation in hypercholesterolemic mice. It remains unclear, however, whether blockade of MCP-1 can limit progression or destabilization of established lesions. Methods and Results— We report here that blockade of MCP-1 by transfecting an N -terminal deletion mutant of the MCP-1 gene limited progression of preexisting atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root in hypercholesterolemic mice. In addition, blockade of MCP-1 changed the lesion composition into a more stable phenotype, ie, containing fewer macrophages and lymphocytes, less lipid, and more smooth muscle cells and collagen. This strategy decreased expression of CD40 and the CD40 ligand in the atherosclerotic plaque and normalized the increased chemokine (RANTES and MCP-1) and cytokine (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-6, interleukin-1β, and transforming growth factor β 1 ) gene expression. These data suggest that MCP-1 is a central mediator in the progression and destabilization of established atheroma. Conclusions— The results of the present study suggest that the inflammatory responses mediated by MCP-1 are important in atherosclerosis and its complications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000038140.80105.ad

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Inoue, S., Egashira, K., Ni, W., Kitamoto, S., Usui, M., Otani, K., Ishibashi, M., Hiasa, K.-I., Nishida, K.-I., & Takeshita, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-11-19
Volume
106
Issue
21
Pages
2700-2706
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2081859430
Cited by
256
References
2
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Gene Therapy Limits Progression and Destabilization of Established Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E–Knockout Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000038140.80105.ad
The paper
Inoue, S., Egashira, K., Ni, W., Kitamoto, S., Usui, M., Otani, K., Ishibashi, M., Hiasa, K.-I., Nishida, K.-I., & Takeshita, A. (2002). Anti-Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Gene Therapy Limits Progression and Destabilization of Established Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E–Knockout Mice. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000038140.80105.ad

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.