Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 704

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantification of Macrophage Content in Atherosclerotic Plaques by Optical Coherence Tomography

Tearney, Guillermo J., Yabushita, Hiroshi, Houser, Stuart L., Aretz, H. Thomas, Jang, Ik-Kyung, Schlendorf, Kelly H., Kauffman, Christopher R., Shishkov, Milen, Halpern, Elkan F., Bouma, Brett E.·2003·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Macrophage degradation of fibrous cap matrix is an important contributor to atherosclerotic plaque instability. An imaging technology capable of identifying macrophages in patients could provide valuable information for assessing plaque vulnerability. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new intravascular imaging modality that allows cross-sectional imaging of tissue with a resolution of ≈10 μm. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of OCT for identifying macrophages in fibrous caps. Methods and Results— OCT images of 26 lipid-rich atherosclerotic arterial segments obtained at autopsy were correlated with histology. Cap macrophage density was quantified morphometrically by immunoperoxidase staining with CD68 and smooth muscle actin and compared with the standard deviation of the OCT signal intensity at corresponding locations. There was a high degree of positive correlation between OCT and histological measurements of fibrous cap macrophage density ( r =0.84, P <0.0001) and a negative correlation between OCT and histological measurements of smooth muscle actin density ( r =−0.56, P <0.005). A range of OCT signal standard deviation thresholds (6.15% to 6.35%) yielded 100% sensitivity and specificity for identifying caps containing >10% CD68 staining. Conclusions— The high contrast and resolution of OCT enables the quantification of macrophages within fibrous caps. The unique capabilities of OCT for fibrous cap characterization suggest that this technology may be well suited for identifying vulnerable plaques in patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000044384.41037.43

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 704

Metadata

Authors
Tearney, G. J., Yabushita, H., Houser, S. L., Aretz, H. T., Jang, I.-K., Schlendorf, K. H., Kauffman, C. R., Shishkov, M., Halpern, E. F., & Bouma, B. E.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-01-07
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
113-119
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2117398327
Cited by
704
References
1
FWCI
26.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Macrophage Content in Atherosclerotic Plaques by Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000044384.41037.43
The paper
Tearney, G. J., Yabushita, H., Houser, S. L., Aretz, H. T., Jang, I.-K., Schlendorf, K. H., Kauffman, C. R., Shishkov, M., Halpern, E. F., & Bouma, B. E. (2003). Quantification of Macrophage Content in Atherosclerotic Plaques by Optical Coherence Tomography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000044384.41037.43

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.