The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TAXUS I: Six- and Twelve-Month Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on a Slow-Release Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Lesions
Abstract
Background— The TAXUS NIRx stent (Boston Scientific Corp) provides local delivery of paclitaxel via a slow-release polymer coating. The TAXUS I trial was the first in-human experience evaluating safety and feasibility of the TAXUS NIRx stent system compared with bare NIR stents (control) (Boston Scientific Corp) for treatment of coronary lesions. Methods and Results— The TAXUS I trial was a prospective, double-blind, three-center study randomizing 61 patients with de novo or restenotic lesions (≤12 mm) to receive a TAXUS (n=31) versus control (n=30) stent (diameter 3.0 or 3.5 mm). Demographics, lesion characteristics, clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups. The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was 0% in both groups ( P =NS). No stent thromboses were reported at 1, 6, 9, or 12 months. At 12 months, the MACE rate was 3% (1 event) in the TAXUS group and 10% (4 events in 3 patients) in the control group ( P =NS). Six-month angiographic restenosis rates were 0% for TAXUS versus 10% for control ( P =NS) patients. There were significant improvements in minimal lumen diameter (2.60±0.49 versus 2.19±0.65 mm), diameter stenosis (13.56±11.77 versus 27.23±16.69), and late lumen loss (0.36±0.48 versus 0.71±0.48 mm) in the TAXUS group (all P <0.01). No evidence of edge restenosis was seen in either group. Intravascular ultrasound analysis showed significant improvements in normalized neointimal hyperplasia in the TAXUS (14.8 mm 3 ) group compared with the control group (21.6 mm 3 ) ( P <0.05). Conclusions— In this feasibility trial, the TAXUS slow-release stent was well tolerated and showed promise for treatment of coronary lesions, with significant reductions in angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measures of restenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kamaly, N., Yameen, B., Wu, J., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346 · Cited by 3,070
A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Stone, G. W., Ellis, S. G., Cox, D. A., Hermiller, J., O'Shaughnessy, C., Mann, J. T., Turco, M., Caputo, R., Bergin, P., Greenberg, J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032441 · Cited by 2,749
Self-citationAbdel-Wahab, M., Richardt, G., Joachim Büttner, H., Toelg, R., Geist, V., Meinertz, T., Schofer, J., King, L., Neumann, F.-J., & Khattab, A. A. (2013) · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.017 · Cited by 533
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies
Kip, K. E., Hollabaugh, K., Marroquin, O. C., & Williams, D. O. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.034 · Cited by 348
New concepts in the design of drug-eluting coronary stents
Garg, S., Bourantas, C., & Serruys, P. W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2013.13 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Grube, E., Silber, S., Hauptmann, K. E., Mueller, R., Buellesfeld, L., Gerckens, U., & Russell, M. E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2003-01-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-42
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2116362164
- Cited by
- 865
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 97.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TAXUS I: Six- and Twelve-Month Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on a Slow-Release Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000047700.58683.a1
- The paper
- Grube, E., Silber, S., Hauptmann, K. E., Mueller, R., Buellesfeld, L., Gerckens, U., & Russell, M. E. (2003). TAXUS I: Six- and Twelve-Month Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial on a Slow-Release Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for De Novo Coronary Lesions. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000047700.58683.a1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.