The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prolonged QTc Interval and High B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Together Predict Mortality in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
Background— The role of QTc interval prolongation in heart failure remains poorly defined. To better understand it, we analyzed the QTc interval duration in patients with heart failure with high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and analyzed the combined prognostic impact of prolonged QTc and elevated BNP. Methods and Results— QTc intervals were measured in 241 patients with heart failure who had BNP levels >400 pg/mL. QT interval duration was determined by averaging 3 consecutive beats through leads II and V 4 on a standard 12-lead ECG and corrected by using the Bazett formula. QTc intervals were prolonged (>440 ms) in 122 (51%) patients and normal in 119 (49%). The BNP levels in these 2 groups were not significantly different (786±321 pg/mL in the prolonged QTc group versus 733±274 pg/mL in the normal QTc group, P =0.13). During 6 months of follow-up, 46 patients died, 9 underwent transplantation, and 17 underwent left ventricular assist device implantation. The deaths were attributed to pump failure (n=24, 52%), sudden cardiac death (n=18, 39%), or noncardiac causes (n=4, 9%). Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 3 times higher in the normal QTc group than in the prolonged QTc group ( P <0.0001). On multivariate analysis, prolonged QTc interval was an independent predictor of all-cause death ( P =0.0001), cardiac death ( P =0.0001), sudden cardiac death ( P =0.004), and pump failure death ( P =0.0006). Conclusions— Prolonged QTc interval is a strong, independent predictor of adverse outcome in patients with heart failure with BNP levels >400 pg/mL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005)
Swedberg, K., Cleland, J., Dargie, H., Drexler, H., Follath, F., Komajda, M., Tavazzi, L., Smiseth, O. A., Gavazzi, A., Haverich, A., et al. (2005) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi204 · Cited by 2,260
Doust, J. A., Pietrzak, E., Dobson, A., & Glasziou, P. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7492.625 · Cited by 710
Significance of QRS Complex Duration in Patients With Heart Failure
Kashani, A., & Barold, S. S. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.071 · Cited by 422
Genetic variation in SCN10A influences cardiac conduction
Chambers, J. C., Zhao, J., Terracciano, C. M. N., Bezzina, C. R., Zhang, W., Kaba, R., Navaratnarajah, M., Lotlikar, A., Sehmi, J. S., Kooner, M. K., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.516 · Cited by 289
Ventricular repolarization measures for arrhythmic risk stratification
Monitillo, F. (2016) · World Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.4330/wjc.v8.i1.57 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Vrtovec, B., Delgado, R., Zewail, A., Thomas, C. D., Richartz, B. M., & Radovancevic, B.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2003-04-08
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1764-1769
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2135589818
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prolonged QTc Interval and High B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Together Predict Mortality in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000057980.84624.95
- The paper
- Vrtovec, B., Delgado, R., Zewail, A., Thomas, C. D., Richartz, B. M., & Radovancevic, B. (2003). Prolonged QTc Interval and High B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Together Predict Mortality in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000057980.84624.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.