The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to α v β 3
Abstract
Background— Angiogenesis is a critical determinant of tumor growth and metastasis. We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) with microbubbles targeted to α v -integrins expressed on the neovascular endothelium could be used to image angiogenesis. Methods and Results— Malignant gliomas were produced in 14 athymic rats by intracerebral implantation of U87MG human glioma cells. On day 14 or day 28 after implantation, CEU was performed with microbubbles targeted to α v β 3 by surface conjugation of echistatin. CEU perfusion imaging with nontargeted microbubbles was used to derive tumor microvascular blood volume and blood velocity. Vascular α v -integrin expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and microbubble adhesion was characterized by confocal microscopy. Mean tumor size increased markedly from 14 to 28 days (2±1 versus 35±14 mm 2 , P <0.001). Tumor blood volume increased by ≈35% from day 14 to day 28, whereas microvascular blood velocity decreased, especially at the central portions of the tumors. On confocal microscopy, α v β 3 -targeted but not control microbubbles were retained preferentially within the tumor microcirculation. CEU signal from α v β 3 -targeted microbubbles in tumors increased significantly from 14 to 28 days (1.7±0.4 versus 3.3±1.0 relative units, P <0.05). CEU signal from α v β 3 -targeted microbubbles was greatest at the periphery of tumors, where α v -integrin expression was most prominent, and correlated well with tumor microvascular blood volume ( r =0.86). Conclusions— CEU with microbubbles targeted to α v β 3 can noninvasively detect early tumor angiogenesis. This technique, when coupled with changes in blood volume and velocity, may provide insights into the biology of tumor angiogenesis and be used for diagnostic applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery
Hernot, S., & Klibanov, A. L. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005 · Cited by 990
Self-citationImaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Hricak, H., Choyke, P. L., Eberhardt, S. C., Leibel, S. A., & Scardino, P. T. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2431030580 · Cited by 601
Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy
DIJKMANS, P., JUFFERMANS, L., MUSTERS, R., VANWAMEL, A., TENCATE, F., VANGILST, W., VISSER, C., DEJONG, N., & KAMP, O. (2004) · European Journal of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.euje.2004.02.001 · Cited by 420
Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated drug delivery
Paefgen, V., Doleschel, D., & Kiessling, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2015.00197 · Cited by 272
Engineered nanoparticles for biomolecular imaging
Mahmoudi, M., Serpooshan, V., & Laurent, S. (2011) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c1nr10326a · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellegala, D. B., Leong-Poi, H., Carpenter, J. E., Klibanov, A. L., Kaul, S., Shaffrey, M. E., Sklenar, J., & Lindner, J. R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2003-07-22
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 336-341
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2132689499
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to α v β 3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000080326.15367.0c
- The paper
- Ellegala, D. B., Leong-Poi, H., Carpenter, J. E., Klibanov, A. L., Kaul, S., Shaffrey, M. E., Sklenar, J., & Lindner, J. R. (2003). Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to α v β 3. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000080326.15367.0c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.