The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Novel Index for Invasively Assessing the Coronary Microcirculation
Abstract
Background— A relatively simple, invasive method for quantitatively assessing the status of the coronary microcirculation independent of the epicardial artery is lacking. Methods and Results— By using a coronary pressure wire and modified software, it is possible to calculate the mean transit time of room-temperature saline injected down a coronary artery. The inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time has been shown to correlate with absolute flow. We hypothesize that distal coronary pressure divided by the inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time provides an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) that will correlate with true microcirculatory resistance (TMR), defined as the distal left anterior descending (LAD) pressure divided by hyperemic flow, measured with an external ultrasonic flow probe. A total of 61 measurements were made in 9 Yorkshire swine at baseline and after disruption of the coronary microcirculation, both with and without an epicardial LAD stenosis. The mean IMR (16.9±6.5 U to 25.9±14.4 U, P =0.002) and TMR (0.51±0.14 to 0.79±0.32 mm Hg · mL −1 · min −1 , P =0.0001), as well as the % change in IMR (147±66%) and TMR (159±105%, P =NS versus IMR % change), increased significantly and to a similar degree after disruption of the microcirculation. These changes were independent of the status of the epicardial artery. There was a significant correlation between mean IMR and TMR values, as well as between the % change in IMR and % change in TMR. Conclusion— Measuring IMR may provide a simple, quantitative, invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes
Vrints, C., Andreotti, F., Koskinas, K. C., Rossello, X., Adamo, M., Ainslie, J., Banning, A. P., Budaj, A., Buechel, R. R., Chiariello, G. A., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177 · Cited by 2,774
Mehra, M. R., Crespo-Leiro, M. G., Dipchand, A., Ensminger, S. M., Hiemann, N. E., Kobashigawa, J. A., Madsen, J., Parameshwar, J., Starling, R. C., & Uber, P. A. (2010) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.017 · Cited by 909
Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease
Jay Widmer, R., & Lerman, A. (2014) · Global Cardiology Science and Practice · doi:10.5339/gcsp.2014.43 · Cited by 356
Reduced lymphatic reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Rossitto, G., Mary, S., McAllister, C., Neves, K. B., Haddow, L., Rocchiccioli, J. P., Lang, N. N., Murphy, C. L., Touyz, R. M., Petrie, M. C., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.022 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Fearon, W. F., Balsam, L. B., Farouque, H. M. O., Robbins, R. C., Fitzgerald, P. J., Yock, P. G., & Yeung, A. C.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3129-3132
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2004389112
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel Index for Invasively Assessing the Coronary Microcirculation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000080700.98607.d1
- The paper
- Fearon, W. F., Balsam, L. B., Farouque, H. M. O., Robbins, R. C., Fitzgerald, P. J., Yock, P. G., & Yeung, A. C. (2003). Novel Index for Invasively Assessing the Coronary Microcirculation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000080700.98607.d1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.