Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Cell Transplantation in Living Animals Using Optical Bioluminescence and Positron Emission Tomography

Open access
Wu, Joseph C., Chen, Ian Y., Sundaresan, Gobalakrishnan, Min, Jung-Joon, De, Abhijit, Qiao, Jian-Hua, Fishbein, Michael C., Gambhir, Sanjiv S.·2003·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The current method of analyzing myocardial cell transplantation relies on postmortem histology. We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of monitoring transplanted cell survival in living animals using molecular imaging techniques. Methods and Results— For optical bioluminescence charged-coupled device imaging, rats (n=20) underwent intramyocardial injection of embryonic rat H9c2 cardiomyoblasts (3×10 6 to 5×10 5 ) expressing firefly luciferase (Fluc) reporter gene. Cardiac bioluminescence signals were present for more than 2 weeks with 3×10 6 cells: day 1 (627 000±15%), day 2 (346 100±21%), day 4 (112 800±20%), day 8 (78 860±24%), day 12 (67 780±12%), and day 16 (62 200±5% p · s −1 · cm 2 −1 · sr −1 ). For micro–positron emission tomography imaging, rats (n=20) received cardiomyoblasts (3×10 6 ) expressing mutant herpes simplex type 1 thymidine kinase (HSV1-sr39tk) reporter gene. Detailed tomography of transplanted cells is shown by 9-(4-[ 18 F]-fluoro-3hydroxymethylbutyl)guanine ([ 18 F]-FHBG) reporter probe and nitrogen-13 ammonia ([ 13 N]-NH 3 ) perfusion images. Within the transplanted region, there was a 4.48±0.71-fold increase of in vivo [ 18 F]-FHBG activity and a 4.01±0.51-fold increase of ex vivo gamma counting compared with control animals. Finally, the in vivo images of cell survival were confirmed by ex vivo autoradiography, histology, immunohistochemistry, and reporter protein assays. Conclusions— The location(s), magnitude, and survival duration of embryonic cardiomyoblasts were monitored noninvasively. With further development, molecular imaging studies should add critical insights into cardiac cell transplantation biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000091252.20010.6e

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Wu, J. C., Chen, I. Y., Sundaresan, G., Min, J.-J., De, A., Qiao, J.-H., Fishbein, M. C., & Gambhir, S. S.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-09-16
Volume
108
Issue
11
Pages
1302-1305
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2167946663
Cited by
286
References
1
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Cell Transplantation in Living Animals Using Optical Bioluminescence and Positron Emission Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000091252.20010.6e
The paper
Wu, J. C., Chen, I. Y., Sundaresan, G., Min, J.-J., De, A., Qiao, J.-H., Fishbein, M. C., & Gambhir, S. S. (2003). Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Cell Transplantation in Living Animals Using Optical Bioluminescence and Positron Emission Tomography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000091252.20010.6e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.