The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dissociation Between Ionic Remodeling and Ability to Sustain Atrial Fibrillation During Recovery From Experimental Congestive Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
Background— Congestive heart failure (CHF) downregulates atrial transient outward ( I to ), slow delayed rectifier ( I Ks ), and L-type Ca 2+ ( I Ca,L ) currents and upregulates Na + -Ca 2+ exchange current ( I NCX ) (ionic remodeling) and causes atrial fibrosis (structural remodeling). The relative importance of ionic versus structural remodeling in CHF-related atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial. Methods and Results— We measured hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters, mean duration of burst pacing–induced AF (DAF), and atrial-myocyte ionic currents in dogs with CHF induced by 2-week ventricular tachypacing (240 bpm), CHF dogs allowed to recover without pacing for 4 weeks (REC), and unpaced controls. Left ventricular ejection fraction averaged 58.6±1.2% (control), 36.2±2.3% (CHF, P <0.01), and 57.9±1.6% (REC), indicating full hemodynamic recovery. Similarly, left atrial pressures were 2.2±0.3 (control), 13.1±1.5 (CHF), and 2.4±0.4 (REC) mm Hg. CHF reduced I to density by ≈65% ( P <0.01), decreased I Ca,L density by ≈50% ( P <0.01), and diminished I Ks density by ≈40% ( P <0.01) while increasing I NCX density by ≈110% ( P <0.05). In REC, all ionic current densities returned to control values. DAF increased in CHF (1132±207 versus 14.3±8.8 seconds, control) and remained increased with REC (1014±252 seconds). Atrial fibrous tissue content also increased in CHF (2.1±0.2% for control versus 10.2±0.7% for CHF, P <0.01), with no recovery observed in REC (9.4±0.8%, P <0.01 versus control, P =NS versus CHF). Conclusions— With reversal of CHF, there is complete recovery of ionic remodeling, but the prolonged-AF substrate and structural remodeling remain. This suggests that structural, not ionic, remodeling is the primary contributor to AF maintenance in experimental CHF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal
Schotten, U., Verheule, S., Kirchhof, P., & Goette, A. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2009 · Cited by 1,273
Atrial Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance in Atrial Fibrillation
Burstein, B., & Nattel, S. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.064 · Cited by 1,242
Self-citationEhrlich, J. R., Hohnloser, S. H., & Nattel, S. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi668 · Cited by 304
Self-citationZicha, S., Xiao, L., Stafford, S., Cha, T. J., Han, W., Varro, A., & Nattel, S. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.075861 · Cited by 171
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cha, T.-J., Ehrlich, J. R., Zhang, L., Shi, Y.-F., Tardif, J.-C., Leung, T. K., & Nattel, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-01-27
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412-418
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2095702602
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissociation Between Ionic Remodeling and Ability to Sustain Atrial Fibrillation During Recovery From Experimental Congestive Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000109501.47603.0c
- The paper
- Cha, T.-J., Ehrlich, J. R., Zhang, L., Shi, Y.-F., Tardif, J.-C., Leung, T. K., & Nattel, S. (2004). Dissociation Between Ionic Remodeling and Ability to Sustain Atrial Fibrillation During Recovery From Experimental Congestive Heart Failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000109501.47603.0c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.