Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 702

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Renal Insufficiency and Heart Failure: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications From a Prospective Cohort Study

McAlister, Finlay A., Ezekowitz, Justin, Tonelli, Marcello, Armstrong, Paul W.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The prevalence, prognostic import, and impact of renal insufficiency on the benefits of ACE inhibitors and β-blockers in community-dwelling patients with heart failure are uncertain. Methods and Results— We analyzed data from a prospective cohort of 754 patients with heart failure who had ejection fraction, serum creatinine, and weight measured at baseline. Median age was 69 years, and 43% had an ejection fraction ≥35%. By the Cockcroft-Gault equation, 118 patients (16%) had creatinine clearances ≤30 mL/min and 301 (40%) had creatinine clearances between 30 and 59 mL/min. During follow-up (median 926 days), 385 patients (37%) died. Even after adjustment for all other prognostic factors, survival was significantly associated with renal function ( P =0.002) in patients with either systolic or diastolic dysfunction; patients exhibited a 1% increase in mortality for each 1-mL/min decrease in creatinine clearance. The associations with 1-year mortality reductions were similar for ACE inhibitors (OR 0.46 [95% CI 0.26 to 0.82] versus OR 0.28 [95% CI 0.11 to 0.70]) and β-blockers (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.70] versus OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.19 to 0.85]) in patients with creatinine clearances <60 mL/min versus ≥60 mL/min, although these drugs were used less frequently in patients with renal insufficiency. Conclusions— Renal insufficiency is more prevalent in patients with heart failure than previously reported and is an independent prognostic factor in diastolic and systolic dysfunction. ACE inhibitors and β-blockers were associated with similar reductions in mortality in patients with and without renal insufficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000116764.53225.a9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 702

Metadata

Authors
McAlister, F. A., Ezekowitz, J., Tonelli, M., & Armstrong, P. W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-03-02
Volume
109
Issue
8
Pages
1004-1009
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2132517877
Cited by
702
References
3
FWCI
25.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renal Insufficiency and Heart Failure: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications From a Prospective Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000116764.53225.a9
The paper
McAlister, F. A., Ezekowitz, J., Tonelli, M., & Armstrong, P. W. (2004). Renal Insufficiency and Heart Failure: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications From a Prospective Cohort Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000116764.53225.a9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.