Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 886

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Open access
Aufderheide, Tom P., Sigurdsson, Gardar, Pirrallo, Ronald G., Yannopoulos, Demetris, McKnite, Scott, von Briesen, Chris, Sparks, Christopher W., Conrad, Craig J., Provo, Terry A., Lurie, Keith G.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— A clinical observational study revealed that rescuers consistently hyperventilated patients during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The objective of this study was to quantify the degree of excessive ventilation in humans and determine if comparable excessive ventilation rates during CPR in animals significantly decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival. Methods and Results— In humans, ventilation rate and duration during CPR was electronically recorded by professional rescuers. In 13 consecutive adults (average age, 63±5.8 years) receiving CPR (7 men), average ventilation rate was 30±3.2 per minute (range, 15 to 49). Average duration per breath was 1.0±0.07 per second. No patient survived. Hemodynamics were studied in 9 pigs in cardiac arrest ventilated in random order with 12, 20, or 30 breaths per minute. Survival rates were then studied in 3 groups of 7 pigs in cardiac arrest that were ventilated at 12 breaths per minute (100% O 2 ), 30 breaths per minute (100% O 2 ), or 30 breaths per minute (5% CO 2 /95% O 2 ). In animals treated with 12, 20, and 30 breaths per minute, the mean intrathoracic pressure (mm Hg/min) and coronary perfusion pressure (mm Hg) were 7.1±0.7, 11.6±0.7, 17.5±1.0 ( P <0.0001), and 23.4±1.0, 19.5±1.8, and 16.9±1.8 ( P =0.03), respectively. Survival rates were 6/7, 1/7, and 1/7 with 12, 30, and 30+ CO 2 breaths per minute, respectively ( P =0.006). Conclusions— Professional rescuers were observed to excessively ventilate patients during out-of-hospital CPR. Subsequent animal studies demonstrated that similar excessive ventilation rates resulted in significantly increased intrathoracic pressure and markedly decreased coronary perfusion pressures and survival rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000126594.79136.61

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aufderheide, T. P., Sigurdsson, G., Pirrallo, R. G., Yannopoulos, D., McKnite, S., von Briesen, C., Sparks, C. W., Conrad, C. J., Provo, T. A., & Lurie, K. G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-04-27
Volume
109
Issue
16
Pages
1960-1965
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2120831964
Cited by
886
References
0
FWCI
67.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.