The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Six- and Twelve-Month Results From First Human Experience Using Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Bioabsorbable Polymer
Abstract
Background— Everolimus, an active immunosuppressive and antiproliferative agent of the same family as sirolimus (rapamycin), has demonstrated significant reduction of neointimal proliferation in animal studies. The First Use To Underscore restenosis Reduction with Everolimus (FUTURE) I trial was the first in-human experience to evaluate the safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents (EES), coated with a bioabsorbable polymer, compared with bare metal stents (BMS). Methods and Results— FUTURE I was a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial that enrolled 42 patients with de novo coronary lesions (EES 27, BMS 15). Patient and lesion characteristics were comparable between the groups. Major adverse cardiac event rates were low at 30 days and 6 months, without any early or late stent thrombosis for either group ( P =NS). Between 6 and 12 months, there were no additional reports of major adverse cardiac events. The 6-month angiographic in-stent restenosis rate was 0% versus 9.1% (1 patient) ( P =NS), with an associated late loss of 0.11 mm versus 0.85 mm ( P <0.001), and the in-segment restenosis rate was 4% (1 patient) and 9.1% (1 patient) ( P =NS) for EES and BMS, respectively. Intravascular ultrasound analysis revealed a significant reduction of percent neointimal volume in EES compared with BMS (2.9±1.9 mm 3 /mm versus 22.4±9.4 mm 3 /mm, P <0.001). There was no late stent malapposition in either group. The safety and efficacy of the EES appeared to be sustained at 12 months. Conclusions— In this initial clinical experience, EES with bioabsorbable polymer demonstrated a safe and efficacious method to reduce in-stent neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biodegradable Metals for Cardiovascular Stents: from Clinical Concerns to Recent Zn‐Alloys
Bowen, P. K., Shearier, E. R., Zhao, S., Guillory, R. J., Zhao, F., Goldman, J., & Drelich, J. W. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201501019 · Cited by 544
Jagur‐Grodzinski, J. (2006) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.729 · Cited by 394
The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies
Kip, K. E., Hollabaugh, K., Marroquin, O. C., & Williams, D. O. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.034 · Cited by 348
Rapamycin: an anti-cancer immunosuppressant?
Law, B. K. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.09.009 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Grube, E., Sonoda, S., Ikeno, F., Honda, Y., Kar, S., Chan, C., Gerckens, U., Lansky, A. J., & Fitzgerald, P. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-05-11
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2168-2171
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2107234115
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six- and Twelve-Month Results From First Human Experience Using Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Bioabsorbable Polymer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000128850.84227.fd
- The paper
- Grube, E., Sonoda, S., Ikeno, F., Honda, Y., Kar, S., Chan, C., Gerckens, U., Lansky, A. J., & Fitzgerald, P. J. (2004). Six- and Twelve-Month Results From First Human Experience Using Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Bioabsorbable Polymer. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000128850.84227.fd
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.