Cited by 645Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Should C-Reactive Protein Be Added to Metabolic Syndrome and to Assessment of Global Cardiovascular Risk?

Ridker, Paul M, Wilson, Peter W.F., Grundy, Scott M.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Of novel risk factors for cardiovascular disease currently under investigation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is the most promising. To date, more than 20 prospective epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that hsCRP independently predicts vascular risk, 6 cohort studies have confirmed that hsCRP evaluation adds prognostic information beyond that available from the Framingham Risk Score, and 8 cohort studies have demonstrated additive prognostic value at all levels of metabolic syndrome or in the prediction of type 2 diabetes. In contrast to several other biomarkers that also reflect biological aspects of inflammation, hypofibrinolysis, and insulin resistance, hsCRP measurement is inexpensive, standardized, widely available, and has a decade-to-decade variation similar to that of cholesterol. Given the consistency of prognostic data for hsCRP and the practicality of its use in outpatient clinical settings, we believe the time has come for a careful consideration of adding hsCRP as a clinical criterion for metabolic syndrome and for the creation of an hsCRP-modified coronary risk score useful for global risk prediction in both men and women. Toward this end, we believe experts in the fields of epidemiology, prevention, vascular biology, and clinical cardiology should be convened to begin discussing the merits of this proposal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000132467.45278.59

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 645

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. Athero- sclerosis. 1998;140:199 -270.

Authors
Ridker, P. M., Wilson, P. W. F., & Grundy, S. M.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-06-15
Volume
109
Issue
23
Pages
2818-2825
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2013976776
Cited by
645
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 43
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular risk prediction, type 2 diabetes, inflammation, Framingham risk score, prognostic factors, insulin resistance, hypofibrinolysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Vasculitis, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Life Tables, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Stroke, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review