Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transcatheter Device Closure of Congenital and Postoperative Residual Ventricular Septal Defects

Knauth, Alison L., Lock, James E., Perry, Stanton B., McElhinney, Doff B., Gauvreau, Kimberlee, Landzberg, Michael J., Rome, Jonathan J., Hellenbrand, William E., Ruiz, Carlos E., Jenkins, Kathy J.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Our purpose was to describe a 13-year experience with patients undergoing transcatheter device closure of unrepaired congenital or postoperative residual ventricular septal defects (VSDs). Methods and Results— Since 1989, 170 patients (median age, 3.9 years) have undergone catheterization for closure of 1 or more congenital (n=92) or postoperative (n=78) residual VSDs using successive generations of STARFlex-type devices. Outcomes included echocardiographic assessment of residual flow and device position, assessment of VSD shunt/severity, and adverse events. Among 168 patients in whom device implantation was performed, between 1 and 7 devices were placed per patient (median, 1), with multiple devices placed in 40%. There was a significant decrease in left-to-right shunting after device implantation ( P <0.001) and significant improvement in VSD size/severity, and device position proved stable. Of 332 adverse events, 39 were related to the device and 261 were related to the catheterization; all but 5 occurred in the periprocedural period. At a median follow-up of 24 months (0 to 154 months), 14 patients had died and 18 had device(s) explanted. Conclusions— Congenital and postoperative VSD closure using STARFlex-type devices resulted in stable improvement in clinical status and decreased interventricular shunting. Although periprocedural events occurred frequently, late events caused by the device were rare. Transcatheter device closure is an effective management option for patients with complex muscular VSDs that are difficult to approach surgically and for postoperative residual VSDs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000137116.12176.a6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Knauth, A. L., Lock, J. E., Perry, S. B., McElhinney, D. B., Gauvreau, K., Landzberg, M. J., Rome, J. J., Hellenbrand, W. E., Ruiz, C. E., & Jenkins, K. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-08-03
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
501-507
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2053560661
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcatheter Device Closure of Congenital and Postoperative Residual Ventricular Septal Defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000137116.12176.a6
The paper
Knauth, A. L., Lock, J. E., Perry, S. B., McElhinney, D. B., Gauvreau, K., Landzberg, M. J., Rome, J. J., Hellenbrand, W. E., Ruiz, C. E., & Jenkins, K. J. (2004). Transcatheter Device Closure of Congenital and Postoperative Residual Ventricular Septal Defects. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000137116.12176.a6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.