The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study
Open accessAbstract
Background— Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently emerged as a potential alternative to carotid endarterectomy. Cerebral embolization is the most devastating complication of CAS, and the echogenicity of carotid plaque has been indicated as one of the risk factors involved. This is the first study to analyze the role of a computer-assisted highly reproducible index of echogenicity, namely the gray-scale median (GSM), on the risk of stroke during CAS. Methods and Results— The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) registry included 418 cases of CAS collected from 11 international centers. An echographic evaluation of carotid plaque with GSM measurement was made preprocedurally. The onset of neurological deficits during the procedure and the postprocedural period was recorded. The overall rate of neurological complications was 3.6%: minor strokes, 2.2%, and major stroke, 1.4%. There were 11 of 155 strokes (7.1%) in patients with GSM ≤25 and 4 of 263 (1.5%) in patients with GSM >25 ( P =0.005). Patients with severe stenosis (≥85%) had a higher rate of stroke ( P =0.03). The effectiveness of brain protection devices was confirmed in those with GSM >25 ( P =0.01) but not in those with GSM ≤25. Multivariate analysis revealed that GSM (OR, 7.11; P =0.002) and rate of stenosis (OR, 5.76; P =0.010) are independent predictors of stroke. Conclusions— Carotid plaque echolucency, as measured by GSM ≤25, increases the risk of stroke in CAS. The inclusion of echolucency measured as GSM in the planning of any endovascular procedure of carotid lesions allows stratification of patients at different risks of complications in CAS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brott, T. G., Halperin, J. L., Abbara, S., Bacharach, J. M., Barr, J. D., Bush, R. L., Cates, C. U., Creager, M. A., Fowler, S. B., Friday, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006 · Cited by 447
Does Free Cell Area Influence the Outcome in Carotid Artery Stenting?
Bosiers, M., de Donato, G., Deloose, K., Verbist, J., Peeters, P., Castriota, F., Cremonesi, A., & Setacci, C. (2007) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.019 · Cited by 320
General principles of carotid Doppler ultrasonography
Lee, W. (2013) · Ultrasonography · doi:10.14366/usg.13018 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Biasi, G. M., Froio, A., Diethrich, E. B., Deleo, G., Galimberti, S., Mingazzini, P., Nicolaides, A. N., Griffin, M., Raithel, D., Reid, D. B., & Valsecchi, M. G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-08-10
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 756-762
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2135941691
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000138103.91187.e3
- The paper
- Biasi, G. M., Froio, A., Diethrich, E. B., Deleo, G., Galimberti, S., Mingazzini, P., Nicolaides, A. N., Griffin, M., Raithel, D., Reid, D. B., & Valsecchi, M. G. (2004). Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000138103.91187.e3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.