Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study

Open access
Biasi, Giorgio M., Froio, Alberto, Diethrich, Edward B., Deleo, Gaetano, Galimberti, Stefania, Mingazzini, Paolo, Nicolaides, Andrew N., Griffin, Maura, Raithel, Dieter, Reid, Donald B., Valsecchi, Maria Grazia·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has recently emerged as a potential alternative to carotid endarterectomy. Cerebral embolization is the most devastating complication of CAS, and the echogenicity of carotid plaque has been indicated as one of the risk factors involved. This is the first study to analyze the role of a computer-assisted highly reproducible index of echogenicity, namely the gray-scale median (GSM), on the risk of stroke during CAS. Methods and Results— The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) registry included 418 cases of CAS collected from 11 international centers. An echographic evaluation of carotid plaque with GSM measurement was made preprocedurally. The onset of neurological deficits during the procedure and the postprocedural period was recorded. The overall rate of neurological complications was 3.6%: minor strokes, 2.2%, and major stroke, 1.4%. There were 11 of 155 strokes (7.1%) in patients with GSM ≤25 and 4 of 263 (1.5%) in patients with GSM >25 ( P =0.005). Patients with severe stenosis (≥85%) had a higher rate of stroke ( P =0.03). The effectiveness of brain protection devices was confirmed in those with GSM >25 ( P =0.01) but not in those with GSM ≤25. Multivariate analysis revealed that GSM (OR, 7.11; P =0.002) and rate of stenosis (OR, 5.76; P =0.010) are independent predictors of stroke. Conclusions— Carotid plaque echolucency, as measured by GSM ≤25, increases the risk of stroke in CAS. The inclusion of echolucency measured as GSM in the planning of any endovascular procedure of carotid lesions allows stratification of patients at different risks of complications in CAS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000138103.91187.e3

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Biasi, G. M., Froio, A., Diethrich, E. B., Deleo, G., Galimberti, S., Mingazzini, P., Nicolaides, A. N., Griffin, M., Raithel, D., Reid, D. B., & Valsecchi, M. G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-08-10
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
756-762
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2135941691
Cited by
468
References
0
FWCI
21.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000138103.91187.e3
The paper
Biasi, G. M., Froio, A., Diethrich, E. B., Deleo, G., Galimberti, S., Mingazzini, P., Nicolaides, A. N., Griffin, M., Raithel, D., Reid, D. B., & Valsecchi, M. G. (2004). Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000138103.91187.e3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.