The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
Background— Left ventricular (LV) mass is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with systemic hypertension. However, the accuracy of 2D echocardiographic LV mass measurements is limited because acquiring anatomically correct apical views is often difficult. We tested the hypothesis that LV mass could be measured more accurately from real-time 3D (RT3D) data sets, which allow offline selection of nonforeshortened apical views, by comparing 2D and RT3D measurements against cardiac MR (CMR) measurements. Methods and Results— Echocardiographic imaging was performed (Philips 7500) in 21 patients referred for CMR imaging (1.5 T, GE). Apical 2- and 4-chamber views and RT3D data sets were acquired and analyzed by 2 independent observers. The RT3D data sets were used to select nonforeshortened apical 2- and 4-chamber views (3DQ-QLAB, Philips). In both 2D and RT3D images, LV long axis was measured; endocardial and epicardial boundaries were traced, and mass was calculated by use of the biplane method of disks. CMR LV mass values were obtained through standard techniques (MASS Analysis, GE). The RT3D data resulted in significantly larger LV long-axis dimensions and measurements of LV mass that correlated with CMR better ( r =0.90) than 2D ( r =0.79). The 2D technique underestimated LV mass (bias, 39%), whereas RT3D measurements showed only minimal bias (3%). The 95% limits of agreement were significantly wider for 2D (52%) than RT3D (28%). Additionally, the RT3D technique reduced the interobserver variability (37% to 7%) and intraobserver variability (19% to 8%). Conclusions— RT3D imaging provides the basis for accurate and reliable measurement of LV mass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lang, R. M., Badano, L. P., Mor-Avi, V., Afilalo, J., Armstrong, A., Ernande, L., Flachskampf, F. A., Foster, E., Goldstein, S. A., Kuznetsova, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003 · Cited by 12,362
Self-citationLang, R. M., Bierig, M., Devereux, R. B., Flachskampf, F. A., Foster, E., Pellikka, P. A., Picard, M. H., Roman, M. J., Seward, J., Shanewise, J. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005 · Cited by 11,318
Self-citationEAE/ASE Recommendations for Image Acquisition and Display Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
Lang, R. M., Badano, L. P., Tsang, W., Adams, D. H., Agricola, E., Buck, T., Faletra, F. F., Franke, A., Hung, J., Pérez de Isla, L., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.11.010 · Cited by 1,129
Self-citationKovacs, R. J., Maldonado, G., Azaro, A., Fernández, M. S., Romero, F. L., Sepulveda-Sánchez, J. M., Corretti, M., Carducci, M., Dolan, M., Gueorguieva, I., et al. (2015) · Cardiovascular Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s12012-014-9297-4 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Mor-Avi, V., Sugeng, L., Weinert, L., MacEneaney, P., Caiani, E. G., Koch, R., Salgo, I. S., & Lang, R. M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-09-28
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1814-1818
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2140351885
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000142670.65971.5f
- The paper
- Mor-Avi, V., Sugeng, L., Weinert, L., MacEneaney, P., Caiani, E. G., Koch, R., Salgo, I. S., & Lang, R. M. (2004). Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000142670.65971.5f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.