Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Mor-Avi, Victor, Sugeng, Lissa, Weinert, Lynn, MacEneaney, Peter, Caiani, Enrico G., Koch, Rick, Salgo, Ivan S., Lang, Roberto M.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Left ventricular (LV) mass is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with systemic hypertension. However, the accuracy of 2D echocardiographic LV mass measurements is limited because acquiring anatomically correct apical views is often difficult. We tested the hypothesis that LV mass could be measured more accurately from real-time 3D (RT3D) data sets, which allow offline selection of nonforeshortened apical views, by comparing 2D and RT3D measurements against cardiac MR (CMR) measurements. Methods and Results— Echocardiographic imaging was performed (Philips 7500) in 21 patients referred for CMR imaging (1.5 T, GE). Apical 2- and 4-chamber views and RT3D data sets were acquired and analyzed by 2 independent observers. The RT3D data sets were used to select nonforeshortened apical 2- and 4-chamber views (3DQ-QLAB, Philips). In both 2D and RT3D images, LV long axis was measured; endocardial and epicardial boundaries were traced, and mass was calculated by use of the biplane method of disks. CMR LV mass values were obtained through standard techniques (MASS Analysis, GE). The RT3D data resulted in significantly larger LV long-axis dimensions and measurements of LV mass that correlated with CMR better ( r =0.90) than 2D ( r =0.79). The 2D technique underestimated LV mass (bias, 39%), whereas RT3D measurements showed only minimal bias (3%). The 95% limits of agreement were significantly wider for 2D (52%) than RT3D (28%). Additionally, the RT3D technique reduced the interobserver variability (37% to 7%) and intraobserver variability (19% to 8%). Conclusions— RT3D imaging provides the basis for accurate and reliable measurement of LV mass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000142670.65971.5f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Mor-Avi, V., Sugeng, L., Weinert, L., MacEneaney, P., Caiani, E. G., Koch, R., Salgo, I. S., & Lang, R. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-09-28
Volume
110
Issue
13
Pages
1814-1818
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2140351885
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000142670.65971.5f
The paper
Mor-Avi, V., Sugeng, L., Weinert, L., MacEneaney, P., Caiani, E. G., Koch, R., Salgo, I. S., & Lang, R. M. (2004). Fast Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass With Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000142670.65971.5f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.